Home/Battles/Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Lab Benchmark Battle
Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Microsoft · 2021
Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968
71/ 100
Launch MSRP$1,429 USD
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968Winner 🏆
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Surface Duo | Samsung SM-F966Z | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 60Hz | 90Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,450 mAh | 4,400 mAh | +4,450 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 23W | Standard | 25W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 5.8" | 6.49" | 6.49" |
| Chassis Weight | 284g | 215g | 215g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.3/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.
When to buy Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968:
Higher overall BeastScore: 71.3 vs top rival 70.7 · Significantly faster wired charging: 23W vs max 0W
When to buy Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7):
Significantly larger display: 6.49" vs max 5.8" for media & multitasking · More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 8GB
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Which phone is better: Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 or Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?
Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.3/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) (70.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.3 vs top rival 70.7 and Significantly faster wired charging: 23W vs max 0W.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 and Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?
Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 is equipped with a 5.8-inch display and 4450 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) features a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 and Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?
In lab hardware evaluations, Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
Score: 71/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Score: 70/100
Google · 2025
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Score: 71/100
Oneplus · 2023
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
Score: 71/100
Xiaomi · 2025
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
Score: 71/100
Vivo · 2024
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Score: 71/100
Oppo · 2024
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Score: 71/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #171 vs 71
Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
V/S
Battle #271 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
V/S
Battle #371 vs 70
Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #471 vs 70
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #571 vs 71
Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
V/S
Battle #671 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
V/S
Battle #771 vs 71
Surface Duo 2 5G Global TD-LTE 256GB 1968 vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
V/S
Battle #871 vs 71
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
V/S