Home/Battles/TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Lab Benchmark Battle
TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Tcl · 2022
TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506)
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506)Winner 🏆
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | TCL 405 | Samsung SM-G766N | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,350 mAh | +5,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.57" | 6.58" | 6.58" |
| Chassis Weight | 190g | 240g | 190g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506):
Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 66.2 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+650 mAh more)
When to buy Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766):
More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 2GB
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Which phone is better: TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) or Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) (66.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+650 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) is equipped with a 6.57-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) features a 6.58-inch display and 4350 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
In lab hardware evaluations, TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2022
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Score: 66/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Score: 66/100
Google · 2022
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Score: 66/100
Oneplus · 2022
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Score: 67/100
Xiaomi · 2024
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Score: 66/100
Vivo · 2022
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Score: 66/100
Oppo · 2022
A17k
Score: 66/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #166 vs 66
TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
V/S
Battle #266 vs 66
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
V/S
Battle #366 vs 66
TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
V/S
Battle #466 vs 66
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
V/S
Battle #566 vs 66
TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
V/S
Battle #666 vs 66
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
V/S
Battle #766 vs 67
TCL 405 TD-LTE LATAM 32GB T506A (TCL T506) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
V/S
Battle #866 vs 67
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
V/S