vivo iQOO 13 vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo iQOO 13 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2024

vivo iQOO 13

vivo iQOO 13
89/ 100
Launch price$750
Xiaomi · 2024

Xiaomi 14T Pro

Xiaomi 14T Pro
89/ 100
Launch price$799
Head-to-head

vivo iQOO 13 wins 3 of 8 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo iQOO 13
vivo iQOO 13
3 wins
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Xiaomi 14T Pro
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
vivo iQOO 13Xiaomi 14T Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • Speedvivo iQOO 13
    95
    90
  • CameraXiaomi 14T Pro
    80
    91
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    88
    88
  • Batteryvivo iQOO 13
    95
    90
  • DisplayXiaomi 14T Pro
    89
    96
  • ConnectivityTie
    95
    95
  • SecurityTie
    100
    100
  • Valuevivo iQOO 13
    85
    68
Key differences
  • vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery6,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Xiaomi 14T Pro has a smoother screen144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger screen6.82" vs 6.67"
  • Xiaomi 14T Pro is lighter209 g vs 213 g
  • vivo iQOO 13 launched cheaper$750 vs $799
  • vivo iQOO 13 has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • vivo iQOO 13 has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO 13
  • ✓$49 cheaper at launch ($750 vs $799)
  • ✓Bigger 6,150 mAh battery (+1,150 mAh)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
Reasons to buy Xiaomi 14T Pro
  • ✓4 g lighter (209 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.67" display at 144 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo iQOO 13Xiaomi 14T Pro
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi 14T Pro Wins Display
Screen typeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED CrystalRes
Screen Size6.82"6.67"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (510 ppi)2712x1220 (446 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion144 Hz ProMotion
Brightness4,500 nits peak4,000 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo iQOO 13 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedImmortalis-G720 MC12
Operating SystemAndroid 15Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage1024 GB256GB / 512GB / 1024GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Xiaomi 14T Pro Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.88, OIS, Sony LYT-81850 MP, f/1.6, OIS, Light Fusion 900
Telephoto Zoom50 MP (2x optical zoom), f/1.85, OIS50 MP (2.6x optical zoom), f/1.9
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/212 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/232 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Xiaomi 14T Pro Lightest Chassis
Dimensions163.6 x 76.7 x 8.1 mm160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm
Weight213 g209 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68IP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 vivo iQOO 13 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,150 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast charging120W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed50W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$750$799
Our verdict

vivo iQOO 13 wins — BeastScore 89.3/100

After comparing all the specs, vivo iQOO 13 is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 89.2 and Larger battery capacity: 6,150 mAh (+1,150 mAh more).

Buy vivo iQOO 13 if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 89.2 · Larger battery capacity: 6,150 mAh (+1,150 mAh more)

Buy Xiaomi 14T Pro if you want

Smoother display: 144Hz refresh rate vs 120Hz

Common questions

Which is better: vivo iQOO 13 or Xiaomi 14T Pro?

vivo iQOO 13 leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.3/100 compared to Xiaomi 14T Pro (89.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 89.2 and Larger battery capacity: 6,150 mAh (+1,150 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo iQOO 13 and Xiaomi 14T Pro?

vivo iQOO 13 has a 6.82-inch display and 6150 mAh battery. Xiaomi 14T Pro has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do vivo iQOO 13 and Xiaomi 14T Pro compare for speed?

vivo iQOO 13 scores 95/100 for performance; Xiaomi 14T Pro scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →