vivo iQOO Z9 Lite vs vivo Y18t: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo iQOO Z9 Lite edges ahead with a BeastScore of 79.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2024

vivo iQOO Z9 Lite

vivo iQOO Z9 Lite
79/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2024

vivo Y18t

vivo Y18t
79/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo iQOO Z9 Lite wins 1 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo iQOO Z9 Lite
vivo iQOO Z9 Lite
1 win
vivo Y18t
vivo Y18t
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
vivo iQOO Z9 Litevivo Y18t
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    70
    70
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    86
    86
  • DisplayTie
    84
    84
  • Connectivityvivo iQOO Z9 Lite
    65
    55
  • SecurityTie
    34
    34
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Lite has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Lite has more RAM6 GB vs 4 GB
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Lite has the faster chipDimensity 6300 vs Unisoc T612
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Lite is better protected from water and dustIP64 vs IP54
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Z9 Lite
  • ✓6.56" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo Y18t
  • ✓6.56" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo iQOO Z9 Litevivo Y18t
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen Size6.56"6.56"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (269 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (269 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorDimensity 6300 Unisoc T612
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR4 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128 GB128 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight185 g185 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP64IP54
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
Bluetoothv5.4v5.2
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

vivo iQOO Z9 Lite wins — BeastScore 79.3/100

The vivo iQOO Z9 Lite is the better pick for most people thanks to its newer Bluetooth (5.4 vs 5.2) and more RAM (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Buy vivo iQOO Z9 Lite if you want

More RAM: 6 GB vs 4 GB

Buy vivo Y18t if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Common questions

Which is better: vivo iQOO Z9 Lite or vivo Y18t?

The vivo iQOO Z9 Lite is the better pick for most people thanks to its newer Bluetooth (5.4 vs 5.2) and more RAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). BeastScore: vivo iQOO Z9 Lite 79.3/100, vivo Y18t 79.3/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo iQOO Z9 Lite and vivo Y18t?

vivo iQOO Z9 Lite has a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. vivo Y18t has a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do vivo iQOO Z9 Lite and vivo Y18t compare for speed?

vivo iQOO Z9 Lite scores 70/100 for performance; vivo Y18t scores 70/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the vivo iQOO Z9 Lite

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship SoC Architecture
22 min read

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3nm architectural deep dive comparing Qualcomm custom Oryon CPU, MediaTek All-Big-Core Dimensity 9400, and Apple A18 Pro—covering microarchitecture, Adreno 830 vs Immortalis-G925 ray tracing, NPU compute, thermal throttling, and real-world gaming frame rates.

Read →
DJI Air 3S vs. DJI Mini 4 Pro vs. DJI Mavic 3 Pro vs. Autel EVO Lite+: The Definitive Flagship Consumer & Prosumer Camera Drone Architecture, 1-inch CMOS vs. Triple Hasselblad Optics, Nightscape LiDAR Omnidirectional Obstacle Sensing, O4 FHD 20km Video Transmission, ActiveTrack 360°, and 46-Minute Flight Endurance Showdown (2026)Flagship Drone Shootout
19 min read

DJI Air 3S vs. DJI Mini 4 Pro vs. DJI Mavic 3 Pro vs. Autel EVO Lite+: The Definitive Flagship Consumer & Prosumer Camera Drone Architecture, 1-inch CMOS vs. Triple Hasselblad Optics, Nightscape LiDAR Omnidirectional Obstacle Sensing, O4 FHD 20km Video Transmission, ActiveTrack 360°, and 46-Minute Flight Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering analysis and flight benchmark comparison across consumer aerial cinematography flagships—evaluating 1-inch CMOS and 4/3 Hasselblad optical arrays, forward LiDAR night navigation, sub-249g regulatory physics, O4 10-bit RF pipelines, and real-world high-wind endurance.

Read →