vivo S60 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo

vivo S60 5G

vivo S60 5G
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo S60 5G wins 1 of 3 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo S60 5G
vivo S60 5G
1 win
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedBatteryDisplay
vivo S60 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. "From specs" scores compare only the specs both phones list. How we score

  • Speedfrom specsvivo S60 5G
    89
    64
  • CameraNot enough data
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • Batteryfrom specsTie
    100
    100
  • Displayfrom specsTie
    88
    88
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueNot enough data
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G has the bigger battery8,340 mAh vs 7,200 mAh
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G has the bigger screen6.83" vs 6.59"
  • vivo S60 5G has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • vivo S60 5G has the faster chipSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo S60 5G
  • ✓6.59" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
  • ✓Bigger 8,340 mAh battery (+1,140 mAh)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.83" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo S60 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAMOLEDNot listed
Screen Size6.59"6.83"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED N/A
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo S60 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera System50 MP, 50MP Main (OIS) + 50MP Ultra-wide + Telephoto
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MP32 MP
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/AN/A
WeightN/AN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity7,200 mAh8,340 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingN/A
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedNot listed
USB Port & SpeedNot listedNot listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G wins — BeastScore 89.0/100

After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 89.0 vs top rival 88.6 and Larger battery capacity: 8,340 mAh (+1,140 mAh more).

Buy vivo S60 5G if you want

More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB

Buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 89.0 vs top rival 88.6 · Larger battery capacity: 8,340 mAh (+1,140 mAh more)

Common questions

Which is better: vivo S60 5G or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G?

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.0/100 compared to vivo S60 5G (88.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.0 vs top rival 88.6 and Larger battery capacity: 8,340 mAh (+1,140 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo S60 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G?

vivo S60 5G has a 6.59-inch display and 7200 mAh battery. Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G has a 6.83-inch display and 8340 mAh battery.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →