vivo X Fold3 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo X Fold3 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2024

vivo X Fold3 Pro

vivo X Fold3 Pro
89/ 100
Launch price$1,499
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo X Fold3 Pro wins 1 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo X Fold3 Pro
vivo X Fold3 Pro
1 win
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
vivo X Fold3 ProXiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    95
    95
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G
    91
    95
  • Displayvivo X Fold3 Pro
    94
    89
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G has the bigger battery6,500 mAh vs 5,700 mAh
  • vivo X Fold3 Pro has the bigger screen8.03" vs 6.83"
  • vivo X Fold3 Pro has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • vivo X Fold3 Pro has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo X Fold3 Pro
  • ✓763 g lighter (236 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$8500 cheaper at launch ($1499 vs $9999)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G
  • ✓Bigger 6,500 mAh battery (+800 mAh)
  • ✓6.83" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo X Fold3 ProXiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G
1. Display & Screen🏆 vivo X Fold3 Pro Wins Display
Screen typeLTPO AMOLED (foldable)AMOLED
Screen Size8.03"6.83"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (403 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
Brightness4,500 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage1024 GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-808undefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto Zoom64 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.6, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.5undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
Dimensions159.3 x 142.4 x 5.2 mmN/A
Weight236 gN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIPX8Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,700 mAh6,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless Charging50W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Not listed
Bluetooth5.4Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1499Price on request
Our verdict

vivo X Fold3 Pro wins — BeastScore 89.3/100

After comparing all the specs, vivo X Fold3 Pro is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Significantly faster wired charging: 100W vs max 0W and Higher resolution main sensor: 50 MP vs max 0 MP.

Buy vivo X Fold3 Pro if you want

Significantly faster wired charging: 100W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 50 MP vs max 0 MP

Buy Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G if you want

Larger battery capacity: 6,500 mAh (+800 mAh more)

Common questions

Which is better: vivo X Fold3 Pro or Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G?

vivo X Fold3 Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.3/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G (89.3/100), driven by advantages in Significantly faster wired charging: 100W vs max 0W and Higher resolution main sensor: 50 MP vs max 0 MP.

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo X Fold3 Pro and Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G?

vivo X Fold3 Pro has a 8.03-inch display and 5700 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G has a 6.83-inch display and 6500 mAh battery.

How do vivo X Fold3 Pro and Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G compare for speed?

vivo X Fold3 Pro scores 95/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →