BeastCompare

vivo X300 E 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo

vivo X300 E 5G

vivo X300 E 5G
86/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi · 2021

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
86/ 100
Launch price$1,199
Head-to-head

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo X300 E 5G
vivo X300 E 5G
2 wins
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
vivo X300 E 5GXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
    86
    90
  • CameraXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
    80
    91
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • Batteryvivo X300 E 5G
    95
    88
  • DisplayXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
    84
    88
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • Valuevivo X300 E 5G
    85
    55
Key differences
  • vivo X300 E 5G has the bigger battery7,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has the bigger screen6.81" vs 6.59"
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo X300 E 5G
  • ✓Bigger 7,200 mAh battery (+2,200 mAh)
  • ✓6.59" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
  • ✓765 g lighter (234 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$8800 cheaper at launch ($1199 vs $9999)
  • ✓50 MP main camera

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo X300 E 5GXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.59"6.81"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED 3200x1440 (515 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A1,700 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Gen 5 Snapdragon 888 (5nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedAdreno 660
Operating SystemAndroid Android 11
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera System50 MP, f/2, OIS, Samsung GN2
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)48 MP (5x optical zoom), f/4.1, OIS
Ultrawide CameraN/A48 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MP20 MP, f/2.2
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/A163.18 x 74.6 x 8.38 mm
WeightN/A234 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 vivo X300 E 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity7,200 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast charging67W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed67W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothNot listed5.2
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 3.2
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$1199
Our verdict

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra wins — BeastScore 86.0/100

After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 85.9 and Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 0W.

Buy vivo X300 E 5G if you want

Larger battery capacity: 7,200 mAh (+2,200 mAh more)

Buy Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 85.9 · Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 0W

Common questions

Which is better: vivo X300 E 5G or Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra?

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to vivo X300 E 5G (85.9/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 85.9 and Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 0W.

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo X300 E 5G and Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra?

vivo X300 E 5G has a 6.59-inch display and 7200 mAh battery. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a 6.81-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do vivo X300 E 5G and Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra compare for speed?

vivo X300 E 5G scores 86/100 for performance; Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy A08
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy A08

Apple iPhone 17e
Apple

Apple iPhone 17e

Pixel 10 Pro
Google

Pixel 10 Pro

OnePlus 10T
Oneplus

OnePlus 10T

Xiaomi 17T 5G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi 17T 5G

vivo Y11d
Vivo

vivo Y11d

Oppo Reno15c 5G (India)
Oppo

Oppo Reno15c 5G (India)

Motorola Moto G17 Power
Motorola

Motorola Moto G17 Power

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Vivo X300 vs vivo X300 E 5G

Compare →
vs

Vivo X300 Ultra vs vivo X300 E 5G

Compare →
vs

Vivo X300s vs vivo X300 E 5G

Compare →
vs

Vivo X300 Pro vs vivo X300 E 5G

Compare →
vs

vivo X300 FE 5G (Russia) vs vivo X300 E 5G

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mi 14 Ultra 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 1TB 24031PN0DC (Xiaomi Aurora)

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mi 13 Ultra 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2304FPN6DC (Xiaomi Ishtar)

Compare →
vs

vivo X300 E 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A08

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →