VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | VP370WW Vivo | Samsung SM-G1600 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 3,000 mAh | 1,950 mAh | +3,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 13 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.2" | 3.8" | 6.2" |
| Chassis Weight | 178g | 160g | 160g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 62.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Which phone is better: VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE leads with an overall BeastScore of 62.8/100 compared to Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 62.8 vs top rival 60.8 and Larger battery capacity: 3,000 mAh (+1,050 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE is equipped with a 6.2-inch display and 3000 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?
In lab hardware evaluations, VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE vs Galaxy Folder2


Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Galaxy Folder2


VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)


Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)


VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

VP370WW Vivo ONE Plus 2019 Dual SIM LTE vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)


Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

