Home/Battles/Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Lab Benchmark Battle
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Xiaomi · 2022
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser)
70/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
70/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) BETTER THAN Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser)Winner 🏆
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Xiaomi Black | Samsung SM-S731U | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,900 mAh | +4,900 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.67" | 6.74" | 6.74" |
| Chassis Weight | 220g | 190g | 190g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser):
Balanced specifications with Xiaomi hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
When to buy Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S):
Larger battery capacity: 4,900 mAh (+400 mAh more) · Lighter body: 190g (30g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)
Which phone is better: Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) or Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.8/100 compared to Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) (69.8/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Xiaomi hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) and Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 4500 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) features a 6.74-inch display and 4900 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) and Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S)?
In lab hardware evaluations, Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2024
Samsung SM-S711J Galaxy S23 FE 5G TD-LTE 256GB SCG24 (Samsung S711)
Score: 70/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Score: 70/100
Google · 2025
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Score: 71/100
Oneplus · 2022
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB IV2201 (BBK Ivan)
Score: 70/100
Xiaomi · 2022
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 21121210G (Xiaomi Ingres)
Score: 70/100
Vivo · 2023
BBK Vivo X90s 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2241HA (BBK V2241HA)
Score: 70/100
Oppo · 2023
Oppo Reno8 T 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 BD KH 128GB CPH2505 (BBK 2505)
Score: 70/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #170 vs 70
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs Samsung SM-S711J Galaxy S23 FE 5G TD-LTE 256GB SCG24 (Samsung S711)
V/S
Battle #270 vs 70
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs Samsung SM-S711J Galaxy S23 FE 5G TD-LTE 256GB SCG24 (Samsung S711)
V/S
Battle #370 vs 70
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #470 vs 70
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #570 vs 71
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
V/S
Battle #670 vs 71
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
V/S
Battle #770 vs 70
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB KSR-A0 (Xiaomi Kaiser) vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB IV2201 (BBK Ivan)
V/S
Battle #870 vs 70
Samsung SM-S731U Galaxy S25 FE 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-S731T (Samsung R13S) vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB IV2201 (BBK Ivan)
V/S