BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6
95/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6Winner 🏆
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORXiaomi BlackSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity8,800 mAh4,400 mAh+8,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size11"7.6"11"
Chassis Weight523g271g271g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6:
  • Larger 8,800 mAh battery capacity (+4,400 mAh more capacity)
  • 11" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 252g lighter chassis (271g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationXiaomi Black Shark Pad 6Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 14Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
socUNISOC Tiger T616Qualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb812
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayIPS LCD, 90Hz 11" (1200x1920 pixels) 206 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g523271
os version1411
battery mah88004400
release date2024-11-012021-08-01
storage options gb256256, 512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 95.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6:
Higher overall BeastScore: 95.0 vs top rival 86.0 · Larger battery capacity: 8,800 mAh (+4,400 mAh more)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Lighter body: 271g (252g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 leads with an overall BeastScore of 95.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (86.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 95.0 vs top rival 86.0 and Larger battery capacity: 8,800 mAh (+4,400 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 is equipped with a 11-inch display and 8800 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 achieves a 94/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.