Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

These two are too close to call on BeastScore — the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
85/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
85/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Too close to call: 0 of 5 categories each

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
0 wins
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4GXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    79
    79
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    95
    95
  • DisplayTie
    94
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has the faster chipHelio G100 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
  • ✓11" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
  • ✓11" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationXiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4GXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size11"11"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorUnisoc Tiger T616 Helio G100
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/AN/A
WeightN/AN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity8,800 mAh8,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedNot listed
USB Port & SpeedNot listedNot listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro are evenly matched

It's a close call: both phones score almost the same, so pick the one whose design and price suit you.

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Common questions

Which is better: Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro?

It's a close call: both phones score almost the same, so pick the one whose design and price suit you. BeastScore: Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G 85.3/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro 85.3/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G has a 11-inch display and 8800 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has a 11-inch display and 8800 mAh battery.

How do Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro compare for speed?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G scores 79/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro scores 79/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
14 min read

DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

A 4-way architectural shootout comparing next-gen 1/1.3-inch HDR sensors, 4nm AI silicon, HB-series optical lens mods, 13.5-stop dynamic range, 8K30 capture, 4-hour battery runtimes, and 1.0-inch gimbal vlogging fidelity.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Crucial T705 vs. Samsung 990 PRO vs. WD_BLACK SN850X vs. Kingston FURY Renegade: The Definitive Flagship PCIe 5.0 & Gen 4 NVMe SSD Architecture, Phison E26 vs. Samsung Pascal Silicon, 14,500 MB/s Sequential Throughput, DirectStorage 1.2, Sustained SLC Caching, and Real-World Thermal Throttling Showdown (2026)Flagship SSD Shootout
15 min read

Crucial T705 vs. Samsung 990 PRO vs. WD_BLACK SN850X vs. Kingston FURY Renegade: The Definitive Flagship PCIe 5.0 & Gen 4 NVMe SSD Architecture, Phison E26 vs. Samsung Pascal Silicon, 14,500 MB/s Sequential Throughput, DirectStorage 1.2, Sustained SLC Caching, and Real-World Thermal Throttling Showdown (2026)

We compare and dissect the 2026 flagship NVMe SSD landscape: 12nm Phison PS5026-E26 vs. 8nm Samsung Pascal S4LV008 vs. WD 20-82-20035-B1 controllers, Micron 232-layer vs. Samsung V-NAND V7 TLC, 14,500 MB/s sequential speeds, DirectStorage 1.2 GPU decompression, sustained pSLC write cache endurance, active heatsink thermal dynamics, and real-world gaming IOPS.

Read →