Galaxy A57 5G vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 85.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2026

Galaxy A57 5G

Galaxy A57 5G
85/ 100
Launch price$549
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
85/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy A57 5G
Galaxy A57 5G
2 wins
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Galaxy A57 5GXiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy A57 5G
    80
    79
  • CameraGalaxy A57 5G
    88
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
    86
    95
  • DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
    88
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueXiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
    80
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G has the bigger battery8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G has the bigger screen11" vs 6.7"
  • Galaxy A57 5G has the faster chipExynos 1680 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy A57 5G
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.7" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
  • ✓Bigger 8,800 mAh battery (+3,800 mAh)
  • ✓11" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy A57 5GXiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G Wins Display
Screen typeSuper AMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.7"11"
Resolution & Density2340x1080 (385 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
Brightness1,900 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy A57 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorExynos 1680 (4nm)Unisoc Tiger T616
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsXclipse 550Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 16Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy A57 5G Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.8, OISundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera8 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens12 MP, f/2.2undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
Dimensions161.7 x 76.7 x 6.9 mmN/A
Weight179 gN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP67Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh8,800 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6Not listed
Bluetooth5.3Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$549Price on request
Our verdict

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G wins — BeastScore 85.3/100

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.7"). The Galaxy A57 5G is worth a look if you prefer its faster chip (Exynos 1680 vs Unisoc Tiger T616).

Buy Galaxy A57 5G if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G if you want

Larger battery: 8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Larger display: 11" vs 6.7"

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy A57 5G or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.7"). The Galaxy A57 5G is worth a look if you prefer its faster chip (Exynos 1680 vs Unisoc Tiger T616). BeastScore: Galaxy A57 5G 84.8/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G 85.3/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy A57 5G and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G?

Galaxy A57 5G has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G has a 11-inch display and 8800 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy A57 5G and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G compare for speed?

Galaxy A57 5G scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G scores 79/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →