Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G: Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 85.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G wins 2 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G9579
- CameraTie8080
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G7595
- DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G8994
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie8585
- Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G has the bigger battery8,800 mAh vs 4,300 mAh
- Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G has the bigger screen11" vs 6.9"
- Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
- Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G wins — BeastScore 85.3/100
The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 4,300 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.9"). The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB).
More RAM: 12 GB vs 8 GB
Larger battery: 8,800 mAh vs 4,300 mAh · Larger display: 11" vs 6.9"
Common questions
Which is better: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G?
The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 4,300 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.9"). The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). BeastScore: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G 85.3/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G 85.3/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G?
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G has a 6.9-inch display and 4300 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G has a 11-inch display and 8800 mAh battery.
How do Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G compare for speed?
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G scores 95/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G scores 79/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Galaxy Z Flip6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G
Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G vs Galaxy A57 5G
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G vs Galaxy A57 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G vs Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G vs Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G
Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 6 4G
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →
Tech NewsPixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?
Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.
Read →