Home/Battles/Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
Lab Benchmark Battle
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Xiaomi · 2023
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood)
69/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2026
Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
69/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) BETTER THAN Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood)Winner 🏆
Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Xiaomi Poco | Samsung SM-E076B/DS | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh | +6,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.67" | 6.74" | 6.74" |
| Chassis Weight | 181g | 199g | 181g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood):
More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 4GB · Lighter body: 181g (18g lighter in hand)
When to buy Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076):
Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more)
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
Which phone is better: Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) or Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)?
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076) (69.4/100), driven by advantages in More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 4GB and Lighter body: 181g (18g lighter in hand).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) and Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)?
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076) features a 6.74-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) and Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)?
In lab hardware evaluations, Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2025
Samsung SM-M066B/DS Galaxy M06 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A066)
Score: 69/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Score: 70/100
Google · 2023
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Score: 68/100
Oneplus · 2022
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN CPH2381 (BBK 2381)
Score: 69/100
Xiaomi · 2025
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)
Score: 69/100
Vivo · 2024
BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
Score: 69/100
Oppo · 2022
Oppo Reno6 Lite 2022 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB CPH2365 (BBK 2219)
Score: 69/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #169 vs 69
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) vs Samsung SM-M066B/DS Galaxy M06 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A066)
V/S
Battle #269 vs 69
Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076) vs Samsung SM-M066B/DS Galaxy M06 5G 2025 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A066)
V/S
Battle #369 vs 70
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #469 vs 70
Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
V/S
Battle #569 vs 68
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
V/S
Battle #669 vs 68
Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
V/S
Battle #769 vs 69
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 22101320G (Xiaomi Redwood) vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN CPH2381 (BBK 2381)
V/S
Battle #869 vs 69
Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076) vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN CPH2381 (BBK 2381)
V/S