Home/Battles/Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
Lab Benchmark Battle
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Xiaomi · 2023
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Oppo · 2025
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) BETTER THAN Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)Winner 🏆
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Xiaomi Redmi | Oppo Reno13 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,800 mAh | +5,800 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.67" | 6.67" | 6.67" |
| Chassis Weight | 202g | 192g | 192g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.6/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt):
Balanced specifications with Xiaomi hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
When to buy Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699):
Larger battery capacity: 5,800 mAh (+300 mAh more) · Lighter body: 192g (10g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)
Which phone is better: Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) or Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)?
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.6/100 compared to Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) (72.6/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Xiaomi hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) and Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)?
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 5500 mAh battery, while Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) features a 6.67-inch display and 5800 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) and Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)?
In lab hardware evaluations, Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2024
Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
Score: 73/100
Apple · 2026
iPhone 17e
Score: 75/100
Google · 2024
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)
Score: 73/100
Oneplus · 2024
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Score: 73/100
Xiaomi · 2025
Xiaomi Poco X7 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB 24095PCADI (Xiaomi Malachite C)
Score: 73/100
Vivo · 2023
BBK Vivo Y78t 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2312BA (BBK V2312)
Score: 73/100
Oppo · 2025
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
Score: 73/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #173 vs 73
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
V/S
Battle #273 vs 73
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
V/S
Battle #373 vs 75
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs iPhone 17e
V/S
Battle #473 vs 75
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) vs iPhone 17e
V/S
Battle #573 vs 73
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)
V/S
Battle #673 vs 73
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)
V/S
Battle #773 vs 73
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
V/S
Battle #873 vs 73
Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
V/S