Home/Battles/Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

Lab Benchmark Battle

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.

Smartphone Battle

Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄

Xiaomi · 2024

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire)

71/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

Samsung · 2025

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

71/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire)Winner 🏆

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta

SPEC FACTOR	Xiaomi Redmi	Samsung SM-F966Z	LEADER
Refresh Rate	60Hz	60Hz	60Hz
Battery Capacity	5,000 mAh	4,400 mAh	+5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	Standard	Standard	25W
Main Camera Sensor	N/A	N/A	48 MP
Screen Display Size	6.67"	6.49"	6.67"
Chassis Weight	188.5g	215g	188.5g Lightest

Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄

Reasons to buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire):

✓26.5g lighter chassis (188.5g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
✓Larger 5,000 mAh battery capacity (+600 mAh more capacity)
✓6.67" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

Reasons to buy Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7):

✓6.49" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄

Specification	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire)	Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) Wins Display
Screen Type & Tech	AM-OLED display	AM-OLED display
Screen Size	6.67"	6.49"
Resolution & Density	1080x2400 (395 ppi)	1080x2520 (423 ppi)
Refresh Rate	60 Hz	60 Hz
Brightness	N/A	N/A
Screen Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	Scratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) Wins Performance
Chipset / Processor	High performance SoC	High performance SoC
CPU Cores	Multi-core high performance	Multi-core high performance
GPU Graphics	Integrated Graphics	Integrated Graphics
Operating System	Android	Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory	8 GB LPDDR	12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage	256GB	256GB
Storage Speed	High-speed flash	High-speed flash
Card Slot	No	No
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) Wins Camera
Primary Camera	N/A	N/A
Telephoto Zoom	None (Digital zoom only)	None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera	N/A	N/A
LiDAR / Depth	None	None
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens	N/A	N/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) Lightest Chassis
Dimensions	N/A	N/A
Weight	188.5 g	215 g
Build Materials	Glass front, metal/glass frame	Glass front, metal/glass frame
SIM Type	Nano-SIM / eSIM support	Nano-SIM / eSIM support
Water Resistance	Not certified	Not certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity	5,000 mAh	4,400 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	N/A	N/A
Wireless Charging	Not supported	Not supported
Reverse Charging	Reverse wireless charging	Reverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
Loudspeaker	Stereo speakers	Stereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone Jack	No	No
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi Standard	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth	Bluetooth 5.3+	Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & Speed	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
NFC	Yes	Yes
11. Sensors & Security
Sensors	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite Features	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
Colors	Standard finishes	Standard finishes
Launch Price	Price on request	Price on request

Editorial Lab Verdict

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.

When to buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire):

Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more)

When to buy Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7):

More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 8GB

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

Which phone is better: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) or Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) (70.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) and Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) features a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the camera capabilities compare between Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) and Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)?

In lab hardware evaluations, Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung · 2025

Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)

Score: 71/100

Apple · 2024

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)

Score: 71/100

Vivo · 2024

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)

Score: 71/100

Oppo · 2024

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Score: 71/100

Motorola · 2025

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Score: 90/100

Trending Matchups

Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons

Battle #171 vs 71

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire)

V/S

Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #271 vs 71

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

V/S

Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #371 vs 70

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire)

V/S

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #471 vs 70

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

V/S

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #571 vs 71

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire)

V/S

Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #671 vs 71

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

V/S

Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #771 vs 71

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 256GB 23129RA5FL (Xiaomi Sapphire)

V/S

OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)

Compare Both Phones→

Battle #871 vs 71

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

V/S

OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)

Compare Both Phones→