BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/A78 vs Oppo A58 4G
Lab Benchmark Battle

A78 vs Oppo A58 4G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across โ‡„
Oppo ยท 2023

A78

A78
80/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Oppo

Oppo A58 4G

Oppo A58 4G
83/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Oppo A58 4G BETTER THAN A78?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

A78
Oppo A58 4GWinner ๐Ÿ†

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORA78 Oppo A58LEADER
Refresh Rate90Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging33WStandard33W Max
Main Camera Sensor50.1 MP50 MP50.1 MP
Screen Display Size6.56"6.72"6.72"
Chassis Weight188gN/A188g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across โ‡„
Reasons to buy A78:
  • โœ“811g lighter chassis (188g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • โœ“50.1MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • โœ“6.56" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Oppo A58 4G:
  • โœ“50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • โœ“6.72" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across โ‡„
SpecificationA78Oppo A58 4G
1. Display & Screen๐Ÿ† Oppo A58 4G Wins Display
Screen Type & TechIPS TFT LCDAMOLED
Screen Size6.56"6.72"
Resolution & Density720x1612 (269 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate90 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance๐Ÿ† A78 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC MT6769 Helio G85
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid 12Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB256 GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics๐Ÿ† A78 Wins Camera
Primary Camera50.1 MP50 MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens8 MP12 MP
7. Body & Dimensions๐Ÿ† A78 Lightest Chassis
Dimensions163.8 x 75.04 x 7.99 mmN/A
Weight188 gN/A
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging๐Ÿ† A78 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging33W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB C reversibleUSB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Oppo A58 4G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Oppo A58 4G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose A78:
Significantly faster wired charging: 33W vs max 0W ยท Lighter body: 188g (811g lighter in hand)
When to choose Oppo A58 4G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 82.8 vs top rival 79.8 ยท Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 90Hz
Upgrade GuideOwn the Oppo A58 4G? See if upgrading to the A78 is worth it
Read the Verdict โ†’
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: A78 vs Oppo A58 4G

Which is better: A78 or Oppo A58 4G?

Oppo A58 4G leads with an overall BeastScore of 82.8/100 compared to A78 (79.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 82.8 vs top rival 79.8 and Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 90Hz.

What are the primary battery and display differences between A78 and Oppo A58 4G?

A78 is equipped with a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Oppo A58 4G features a 6.72-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between A78 and Oppo A58 4G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, A78 achieves a 80/100 performance score, while Oppo A58 4G scores 79/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News โ†’
Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open GateCamera
5 min read

Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate

Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.

Read Analysis โ†’
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis โ†’
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read Analysis โ†’