Ace Racing vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 85.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Ace Racing
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedAce Racing9079
- CameraAce Racing8480
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro8895
- DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro8694
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueXiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro6885
- Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has the bigger battery8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has the bigger screen11" vs 6.59"
- Ace Racing has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
- Ace Racing has the faster chipDimensity 8100 vs Helio G100
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro wins — BeastScore 85.3/100
The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.59"). The Ace Racing is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB).
More RAM: 12 GB vs 8 GB
Larger battery: 8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Larger display: 11" vs 6.59"
Common questions
Which is better: Ace Racing or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro?
The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and bigger screen (11" vs 6.59"). The Ace Racing is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). BeastScore: Ace Racing 85.1/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro 85.3/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Ace Racing and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro?
Ace Racing has a 6.59-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro has a 11-inch display and 8800 mAh battery.
How do Ace Racing and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro compare for speed?
Ace Racing scores 90/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro scores 79/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Ace Racing vs Galaxy A57 5G
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs Galaxy A57 5G
Ace Racing vs Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)
Ace Racing vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G
Ace Racing vs OnePlus Nord CE5 5G
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs OnePlus Nord CE5 5G
Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship SoC ArchitectureSnapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 3nm architectural deep dive comparing Qualcomm custom Oryon CPU, MediaTek All-Big-Core Dimensity 9400, and Apple A18 Pro—covering microarchitecture, Adreno 830 vs Immortalis-G925 ray tracing, NPU compute, thermal throttling, and real-world gaming frame rates.
Read →
Hardware Deep DiveDJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
A 4-way architectural shootout comparing next-gen 1/1.3-inch HDR sensors, 4nm AI silicon, HB-series optical lens mods, 13.5-stop dynamic range, 8K30 capture, 4-hour battery runtimes, and 1.0-inch gimbal vlogging fidelity.
Read →