Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Fold BETTER THAN Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Apple iPad | Samsung Galaxy | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 7,306 mAh | 4,380 mAh | +7,306 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | N/A | 7.3" | 7.3" |
| Chassis Weight | 437g | 276g | 276g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Samsung Galaxy Fold edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Fold ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Which is better: Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) or Samsung Galaxy Fold?
Samsung Galaxy Fold leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) (73.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 73.0 and Significantly larger display: 7.3" vs max 0" for media & multitasking.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) and Samsung Galaxy Fold?
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) is equipped with a display and 7306 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Fold features a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) and Samsung Galaxy Fold?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Fold scores 88/100.
Related Tablets & iPads (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Find N 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PEUM00
Find N 2021 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PEUM00
Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB
Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
More Tablets & iPads Battles
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) vs Find N 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PEUM00
Samsung Galaxy Fold vs Galaxy S26+
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) vs Find N 2021 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PEUM00
Samsung Galaxy Fold vs iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) vs Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB
Samsung Galaxy Fold vs Pixel 10a
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (2016) vs Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB
Samsung Galaxy Fold vs OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
MarketTrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026
TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.
GuideHere are the Apple iPhone Duo alternatives
Explore top alternatives to the $2,000 Apple iPhone Duo, including the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, Xiaomi 18 Fold 5G, Vivo X Fold5 Pro, and OnePlus Open 2.