BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
ASUS

Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG

Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAsus FonepadSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,950 mAh4,400 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight280g271g271g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG:
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 9g lighter chassis (271g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+450 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAsus Fonepad 7 FE171CGSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.4Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
socIntel Atom Z2520Qualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb212
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayIPS LCD 7" (600x1024 pixels) 170 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g280271
os version4.411
battery mah39504400
release date2015-01-012021-08-01
storage options gb8, 16256, 512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG:
Balanced specifications with ASUS hardware design · Runs Android 4.4 with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 73.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+450 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG (73.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 73.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+450 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3950 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
18 min read

ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural deep dive comparing the ASUS ROG Ally X, Valve Steam Deck OLED, and Lenovo Legion Go across AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs. custom Sephiroth APUs, 80Wh vs 50Wh vs 49.2Wh battery thermals, RDNA 3 compute, SteamOS vs Windows 11 optimization, and real-world frametimes.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read Analysis →
Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. Sony WF-1000XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4: The Definitive Flagship ANC Earbuds Architecture, Custom Acoustic Drivers, Adaptive DSP, FDA Clinical Hearing Aid Validation, Lossless Codecs, and Noise Cancellation Showdown (2026)Definitive Audio Guide 2026
16 min read

Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. Sony WF-1000XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4: The Definitive Flagship ANC Earbuds Architecture, Custom Acoustic Drivers, Adaptive DSP, FDA Clinical Hearing Aid Validation, Lossless Codecs, and Noise Cancellation Showdown (2026)

We stress-test the four titans of true wireless audio across low-frequency subway rumble, vocal babble attenuation, clinical hearing aid acoustic profiling, LDAC vs. aptX Lossless throughput, and real-world battery endurance.

Read Analysis →