BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Lab Benchmark Battle

Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
ASUS

Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG

Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Tecno Mobile

Tecno Phantom V Fold2

Tecno Phantom V Fold2
82/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Tecno Phantom V Fold2 BETTER THAN Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG
Tecno Phantom V Fold2Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAsus FonepadTecno PhantomLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,950 mAh5,750 mAh+5,750 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A7.85"7.85"
Chassis Weight328g249g249g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG:

Comprehensive flagship hardware with verified benchmark scores.

Reasons to buy Tecno Phantom V Fold2:
  • 79g lighter chassis (249g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 5,750 mAh battery capacity (+1,800 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.85" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAsus Fonepad 8 FE380CGTecno Phantom V Fold2
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.4.2Android 14, up to 2 major upgrades
ram gb212
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayIPS LCD (800x1280 pixels)Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz 7.85" (2000x2296 pixels) 388 PPI
weight g328249
os version4.4.214
battery mah39505750
connectivitynfc: No, usb: microUSB 2.0, wifi: Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot, bluetooth: 4.0, A2DP
release date2014-01-012024-09-01
storage options gb1, 2, 8, 16512
socDimensity 9000+
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Tecno Phantom V Fold2 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Tecno Phantom V Fold2 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG:
Balanced specifications with ASUS hardware design · Runs Android 4.4.2 with optimized security support
When to choose Tecno Phantom V Fold2:
Higher overall BeastScore: 82.0 vs top rival 73.0 · Larger battery capacity: 5,750 mAh (+1,800 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2

Which is better: Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG or Tecno Phantom V Fold2?

Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads with an overall BeastScore of 82.0/100 compared to Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG (73.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 82.0 vs top rival 73.0 and Larger battery capacity: 5,750 mAh (+1,800 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG and Tecno Phantom V Fold2?

Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG is equipped with a display and 3950 mAh battery, while Tecno Phantom V Fold2 features a 7.85-inch display and 5750 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG and Tecno Phantom V Fold2?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Asus Fonepad 8 FE380CG achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Tecno Phantom V Fold2 scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
18 min read

ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural deep dive comparing the ASUS ROG Ally X, Valve Steam Deck OLED, and Lenovo Legion Go across AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs. custom Sephiroth APUs, 80Wh vs 50Wh vs 49.2Wh battery thermals, RDNA 3 compute, SteamOS vs Windows 11 optimization, and real-world frametimes.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read Analysis →
Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. Sony WF-1000XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4: The Definitive Flagship ANC Earbuds Architecture, Custom Acoustic Drivers, Adaptive DSP, FDA Clinical Hearing Aid Validation, Lossless Codecs, and Noise Cancellation Showdown (2026)Definitive Audio Guide 2026
16 min read

Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. Sony WF-1000XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4: The Definitive Flagship ANC Earbuds Architecture, Custom Acoustic Drivers, Adaptive DSP, FDA Clinical Hearing Aid Validation, Lossless Codecs, and Noise Cancellation Showdown (2026)

We stress-test the four titans of true wireless audio across low-frequency subway rumble, vocal babble attenuation, clinical hearing aid acoustic profiling, LDAC vs. aptX Lossless throughput, and real-world battery endurance.

Read Analysis →