BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Camon 30 vs Camon 30 Premier
Lab Benchmark Battle

Camon 30 vs Camon 30 Premier

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Tecno · 2024

Camon 30

Camon 30
78/ 100
Launch MSRP$349 USD
Tecno · 2024

Camon 30 Premier

Camon 30 Premier
80/ 100
Launch MSRP$1,199 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Camon 30 Premier BETTER THAN Camon 30?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Camon 30
Camon 30 PremierWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORCamon 30Camon 30LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,200 mAh+5,200 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor50 MP108 MP108 MP
Screen Display Size6.7"6.9"6.9"
Chassis Weight195g210g195g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Camon 30:
  • ✓15g lighter chassis (195g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓$850 lower launch MSRP ($349 vs $1199)
  • ✓50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
Reasons to buy Camon 30 Premier:
  • ✓Larger 5,200 mAh battery capacity (+200 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓108MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓6.9" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationCamon 30Camon 30 Premier
1. Display & Screen🏆 Camon 30 Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAMOLED / OLED displayAMOLED / OLED display
Screen Size6.7"6.9"
Resolution & DensityN/A N/A
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Camon 30 Premier Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB512GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Camon 30 Premier Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP108 MP
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP50 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Camon 30 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight195 g210 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Camon 30 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,200 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$349$1199
Editorial Lab Verdict

Camon 30 Premier edges ahead with a BeastScore of 80.1/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Camon 30 Premier ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Camon 30:
Lighter body: 195g (15g lighter in hand) · Lower launch price: $349 (save $850)
When to choose Camon 30 Premier:
Higher overall BeastScore: 80.1 vs top rival 77.6 · Larger battery capacity: 5,200 mAh (+200 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Camon 30 vs Camon 30 Premier

Which is better: Camon 30 or Camon 30 Premier?

Camon 30 Premier leads with an overall BeastScore of 80.1/100 compared to Camon 30 (77.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 80.1 vs top rival 77.6 and Larger battery capacity: 5,200 mAh (+200 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Camon 30 and Camon 30 Premier?

Camon 30 is equipped with a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Camon 30 Premier features a 6.9-inch display and 5200 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Camon 30 and Camon 30 Premier?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Camon 30 achieves a 72/100 performance score, while Camon 30 Premier scores 90/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read Analysis →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read Analysis →