BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Camon 30 vs Tecno Camon 50
Lab Benchmark Battle

Camon 30 vs Tecno Camon 50

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across โ‡„
Tecno ยท 2024

Camon 30

Camon 30
78/ 100
Launch MSRP$349 USD
Tecno

Tecno Camon 50

Tecno Camon 50
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Tecno Camon 50 BETTER THAN Camon 30?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Camon 30
Tecno Camon 50Winner ๐Ÿ†

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORCamon 30Tecno CamonLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh6,150 mAh+6,150 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor50 MP50 MP50 MP
Screen Display Size6.7"6.78"6.78"
Chassis Weight195gN/A195g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across โ‡„
Reasons to buy Camon 30:
  • โœ“804g lighter chassis (195g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • โœ“$9650 lower launch MSRP ($349 vs $9999)
  • โœ“50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
Reasons to buy Tecno Camon 50:
  • โœ“Larger 6,150 mAh battery capacity (+1,150 mAh more capacity)
  • โœ“50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • โœ“6.78" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across โ‡„
SpecificationCamon 30Tecno Camon 50
1. Display & Screen๐Ÿ† Tecno Camon 50 Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAMOLED / OLED displayAMOLED / OLED display
Screen Size6.7"6.78"
Resolution & DensityN/A N/A
Refresh Rate60 Hz120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance๐Ÿ† Camon 30 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC Helio G200 Ultimate
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB128 GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics๐Ÿ† Camon 30 Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP50 MP, 50MP Main + Depth Sensor
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP16 MP
7. Body & Dimensions๐Ÿ† Camon 30 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight195 gN/A
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging๐Ÿ† Tecno Camon 50 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh6,150 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3+Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$349Price on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Tecno Camon 50 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Tecno Camon 50 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Camon 30:
Lighter body: 195g (804g lighter in hand) ยท Lower launch price: $349 (save $Infinity)
When to choose Tecno Camon 50:
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 77.6 ยท Larger battery capacity: 6,150 mAh (+1,150 mAh more)
Upgrade GuideOwn the Camon 30? See if upgrading to the Tecno Camon 50 is worth it
Read the Verdict โ†’
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Camon 30 vs Tecno Camon 50

Which is better: Camon 30 or Tecno Camon 50?

Tecno Camon 50 leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Camon 30 (77.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 77.6 and Larger battery capacity: 6,150 mAh (+1,150 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Camon 30 and Tecno Camon 50?

Camon 30 is equipped with a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while Tecno Camon 50 features a 6.78-inch display and 6150 mAh battery.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News โ†’
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis โ†’
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read Analysis โ†’
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read Analysis โ†’