Lab Benchmark Battle
Com 738 vs Galaxy Folder2
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Bosch · 1996
Com 738
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2017
Galaxy Folder2
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE
WHY IS Com 738 BETTER THAN Galaxy Folder2?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
Com 738Winner 🏆
Galaxy Folder2
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Com 738 | Galaxy Folder2 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 650 mAh | 1,950 mAh | +1,950 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | 8 MP | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | N/A | 3.8" | 6.1" |
| Chassis Weight | 189g | 165g | 165g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Editorial Lab Verdict
Com 738 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Com 738 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
When to buy Com 738:
Balanced specifications with Bosch hardware design · Runs Feature phone with optimized security support
When to buy Galaxy Folder2:
Larger battery capacity: 1,950 mAh (+1,300 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 3.8" vs max 0" for media & multitasking
Quick Answers
Frequently Asked Questions: Com 738 vs Galaxy Folder2
Which phone is better: Com 738 or Galaxy Folder2?
Com 738 leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Galaxy Folder2 (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Bosch hardware design and Runs Feature phone with optimized security support.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Com 738 and Galaxy Folder2?
Com 738 is equipped with a display and 650 mAh battery, while Galaxy Folder2 features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Com 738 and Galaxy Folder2?
In lab hardware evaluations, Com 738 scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Galaxy Folder2 scores 60/100.
Similar Hardware Tier
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung · 2016
Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Score: 61/100
Apple · 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Score: 66/100
Google · 2022
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Score: 66/100
Oneplus · 2022
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Score: 67/100
Xiaomi · 2014
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Score: 61/100
Vivo · 2015
BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
Score: 61/100
Oppo · 2016
Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m
Score: 61/100
Motorola · 2025
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Score: 90/100
Trending Matchups
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Battle #161 vs 61
Com 738 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
V/S
Battle #261 vs 61
Galaxy Folder2 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
V/S
Battle #361 vs 66
Com 738 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
V/S
Battle #461 vs 66
Galaxy Folder2 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
V/S
Battle #561 vs 66
Com 738 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
V/S
Battle #661 vs 66
Galaxy Folder2 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
V/S
Battle #761 vs 67
Com 738 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
V/S
Battle #861 vs 67
Galaxy Folder2 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
V/S