Home/Battles/Com 738 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Lab Benchmark Battle

Com 738 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.

Smartphone Battle

Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄

Bosch · 1996

Com 738

61/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

Samsung · 2016

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

61/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Com 738 BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Com 738Winner 🏆

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta

SPEC FACTOR	Com 738	Samsung SM-G1600	LEADER
Refresh Rate	60Hz	60Hz	60Hz
Battery Capacity	650 mAh	1,950 mAh	+1,950 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	Standard	Standard	25W
Main Camera Sensor	N/A	N/A	48 MP
Screen Display Size	N/A	3.8"	6.1"
Chassis Weight	189g	160g	160g Lightest

Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄

Reasons to buy Com 738:

Comprehensive flagship hardware with verified benchmark scores.

Reasons to buy Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160):

✓29g lighter chassis (160g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
✓Larger 1,950 mAh battery capacity (+1,300 mAh more capacity)
✓3.8" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄

Specification	Com 738	Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Com 738 Wins Display
Screen Type & Tech	Monochrome graphic	Color TN-TFT LCD display
Screen Size	N/A	3.8"
Resolution & Density	N/A	480x800 (245 ppi)
Refresh Rate	60 Hz ProMotion	60 Hz
Brightness	N/A	N/A
Screen Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	Scratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Com 738 Wins Performance
Chipset / Processor	High performance SoC	High performance SoC
CPU Cores	Multi-core high performance	Multi-core high performance
GPU Graphics	Integrated Graphics	Integrated Graphics
Operating System	Feature phone	Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory	1 GB LPDDR	2 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage	N/A	16GB
Storage Speed	High-speed flash	High-speed flash
Card Slot	No	No
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Com 738 Wins Camera
Primary Camera	N/A	N/A
Telephoto Zoom	None (Digital zoom only)	None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera	N/A	N/A
LiDAR / Depth	None	None
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens	N/A	N/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) Lightest Chassis
Dimensions	N/A	N/A
Weight	189 g	160 g
Build Materials	Glass front, metal/glass frame	Glass front, metal/glass frame
SIM Type	Nano-SIM / eSIM support	Nano-SIM / eSIM support
Water Resistance	Not certified	Not certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Com 738 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity	650 mAh	1,950 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	N/A	N/A
Wireless Charging	Not supported	Not supported
Reverse Charging	Reverse wireless charging	Reverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
Loudspeaker	Stereo speakers	Stereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone Jack	No	No
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi Standard	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth	Bluetooth 5.3+	Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & Speed	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
NFC	Yes	Yes
11. Sensors & Security
Sensors	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite Features	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
Colors	Standard finishes	Standard finishes
Launch Price	Price on request	Price on request

Editorial Lab Verdict

Com 738 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Com 738 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.

When to buy Com 738:

Balanced specifications with Bosch hardware design · Runs Feature phone with optimized security support

When to buy Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160):

Larger battery capacity: 1,950 mAh (+1,300 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 3.8" vs max 0" for media & multitasking

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Com 738 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Which phone is better: Com 738 or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Com 738 leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Bosch hardware design and Runs Feature phone with optimized security support.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Com 738 and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Com 738 is equipped with a display and 650 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) features a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery.

How do the camera capabilities compare between Com 738 and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

In lab hardware evaluations, Com 738 scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

V/S

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Compare Both Phones→

Com 738 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Com 738

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

WHY IS Com 738 BETTER THAN Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Com 738 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100

Frequently Asked Questions: Com 738 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)

Which phone is better: Com 738 or Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

What are the primary battery and display differences between Com 738 and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

How do the camera capabilities compare between Com 738 and Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)?

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons

Com 738 vs Galaxy Folder2

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Galaxy Folder2

Com 738 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Com 738 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

Com 738 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)