Com 738 vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.
WHY IS Com 738 BETTER THAN Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Com 738 | Xiaomi Mi4 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 650 mAh | 3,080 mAh | +3,080 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | N/A | 5" | 6.1" |
| Chassis Weight | 189g | 149g | 149g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Com 738 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Com 738 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 60/100 camera rating.
Frequently Asked Questions: Com 738 vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Which phone is better: Com 738 or Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Com 738 leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Bosch hardware design and Runs Feature phone with optimized security support.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Com 738 and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Com 738 is equipped with a display and 650 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) features a 5-inch display and 3080 mAh battery.
How do the camera capabilities compare between Com 738 and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
In lab hardware evaluations, Com 738 scores 60/100 in camera performance, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Hongmi / Redmi 2013022 (Xiaomi Red Rice)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons
Com 738 vs Galaxy Folder2


Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Galaxy Folder2


Com 738 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)


Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)


Com 738 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

Com 738 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)


Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

