Galaxy A35 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin): Which One Should You Buy?
Galaxy A35 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Galaxy A35 5G wins 3 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie8080
- CameraGalaxy A35 5G8860
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieXiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)6076
- BatteryXiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)8696
- DisplayGalaxy A35 5G8662
- ConnectivityTie6868
- SecurityXiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)86100
- ValueGalaxy A35 5G8068
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) charges faster90W vs 25W
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has the bigger screen6.67" vs 6.6"
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) is lighter198 g vs 210 g
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) launched cheaper$379 vs $399
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has a sharper selfie camera20 MP vs 13 MP
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.3
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has the faster chipDimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP67
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Galaxy A35 5G wins — BeastScore 84.4/100
After comparing all the specs, Galaxy A35 5G is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 84.4 vs top rival 73.4.
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.4 vs top rival 73.4
Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more) · Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 25W
Common questions
Which is better: Galaxy A35 5G or Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)?
Galaxy A35 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) (73.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.4 vs top rival 73.4.
What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy A35 5G and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)?
Galaxy A35 5G has a 6.6-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has a 6.67-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.
How do Galaxy A35 5G and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) compare for speed?
Galaxy A35 5G scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Galaxy A35 5G vs Galaxy A37 5G
Galaxy A35 5G vs Galaxy A36
Samsung SM-A336E/DS Galaxy A33 5G 2022 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung A336) vs Galaxy A35 5G
Galaxy A34 vs Galaxy A35 5G
POCO X7 Pro vs Galaxy A35 5G
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 5G
POCO X5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
POCO X6 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
Related articles
All articles →
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Read →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →





