Galaxy A36 vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin): Which One Should You Buy?
Galaxy A36 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) wins 4 of 8 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie8080
- CameraGalaxy A368860
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieXiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)6076
- BatteryXiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)8696
- DisplayGalaxy A368862
- ConnectivityXiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)5768
- SecurityXiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)86100
- ValueGalaxy A368068
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) charges faster90W vs 45W
- Galaxy A36 has the bigger screen6.7" vs 6.67"
- Galaxy A36 is lighter195 g vs 198 g
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) launched cheaper$379 vs $399
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has a sharper selfie camera20 MP vs 12 MP
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.3
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has the faster chipDimensity 8400 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5
- Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP67
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Galaxy A36 wins — BeastScore 84.8/100
After comparing all the specs, Galaxy A36 is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 73.4.
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 73.4
Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more) · Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 45W
Common questions
Which is better: Galaxy A36 or Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)?
Galaxy A36 leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.8/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) (73.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 73.4.
What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy A36 and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)?
Galaxy A36 has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) has a 6.67-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.
How do Galaxy A36 and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) compare for speed?
Galaxy A36 scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Galaxy A36 vs Galaxy A37 5G
Galaxy A34 vs Galaxy A36
Galaxy A35 5G vs Galaxy A36
Galaxy A36 vs Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
POCO X7 Pro vs Galaxy A36
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin) vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 5G
POCO X5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
POCO X6 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2412DPC0AG (Xiaomi Rodin)
Related articles
All articles →
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Read →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →





