BeastCompare

Galaxy A72 vs Mi 13 Lite: Which One Should You Buy?

Galaxy A72 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 80.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2021

Galaxy A72

Galaxy A72
81/ 100
Launch price$549
Xiaomi · 2023

Mi 13 Lite

Mi 13 Lite
81/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Galaxy A72 wins 3 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy A72
Galaxy A72
3 wins
Mi 13 Lite
Mi 13 Lite
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Galaxy A72Mi 13 Lite
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedMi 13 Lite
    72
    80
  • CameraGalaxy A72
    91
    84
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    88
    88
  • BatteryGalaxy A72
    86
    80
  • DisplayMi 13 Lite
    74
    86
  • ConnectivityTie
    55
    55
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueGalaxy A72
    80
    68
Key differences
  • Galaxy A72 has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
  • Mi 13 Lite charges faster67W vs 25W
  • Galaxy A72 has a sharper main camera64 MP vs 50.3 MP
  • Mi 13 Lite has a smoother screen120 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • Galaxy A72 has the bigger screen6.7" vs 6.55"
  • Mi 13 Lite is lighter171.8 g vs 203 g
  • Mi 13 Lite has newer Bluetooth5.2 vs 5
  • Mi 13 Lite has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy A72
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+500 mAh)
  • ✓64 MP main camera
  • ✓6.7" display at 90 Hz
Reasons to buy Mi 13 Lite
  • ✓31.19999999999999 g lighter (171.8 g vs 203 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50.3 MP main camera
  • ✓6.55" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy A72Mi 13 Lite
1. Display & Screen🏆 Mi 13 Lite Wins Display
Screen typeSuper AMOLED Plus Infinity-OAM-OLED
Screen Size6.7"6.55"
Resolution & Density2400x1080 (393 ppi)1080x2400 (402 ppi)
Refresh Rate90 Hz120 Hz
Brightness800 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Mi 13 Lite Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 720G (8nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 5G SM7450-AB (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 618Qualcomm Adreno 644
Operating SystemAndroid 11Android 12
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB128GB / 256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy A72 Wins Camera
Primary Camera64 MP, f/1.8, OIS50.3 MP
Telephoto Zoom8 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera12 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MP, f/2.232 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Mi 13 Lite Lightest Chassis
Dimensions165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm159.2 x 72.7 x 7.23 mm
Weight203 g171.8 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP67Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Galaxy A72 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh4,500 mAh
Wired Fast Charging25W wired fast charging67W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 5Not listed
Bluetooth5.0Bluetooth 5.2
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0USB C reversible
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$549Price on request
Our verdict

Galaxy A72 wins — BeastScore 80.8/100

The Galaxy A72 is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh) and sharper main camera (64 MP vs 50.3 MP). The Mi 13 Lite is worth a look if you prefer its faster charging (67W vs 25W).

Buy Galaxy A72 if you want

Larger battery: 5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh · Higher-resolution main camera: 64 MP vs 50.3 MP

Buy Mi 13 Lite if you want

Faster wired charging: 67W vs 25W · Smoother display: 120 Hz vs 90 Hz

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy A72 or Mi 13 Lite?

The Galaxy A72 is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh) and sharper main camera (64 MP vs 50.3 MP). The Mi 13 Lite is worth a look if you prefer its faster charging (67W vs 25W). BeastScore: Galaxy A72 80.8/100, Mi 13 Lite 81.0/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy A72 and Mi 13 Lite?

Galaxy A72 has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Mi 13 Lite has a 6.55-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy A72 and Mi 13 Lite compare for speed?

Galaxy A72 scores 72/100 for performance; Mi 13 Lite scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy M13 (India)
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy M13 (India)

Apple iPad (2025)
Apple

Apple iPad (2025)

Google Pixel 10a 5G
Google

Google Pixel 10a 5G

OnePlus N6x
Oneplus

OnePlus N6x

POCO F3
Xiaomi

POCO F3

vivo T5e
Vivo

vivo T5e

Oppo A5x 5G
Oppo

Oppo A5x 5G

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Galaxy A72 vs Galaxy A73

Compare →
vs

Galaxy A72 vs Samsung Galaxy M13 (India)

Compare →
vs

Mi 13 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy M13 (India)

Compare →
vs

Galaxy A72 vs Apple iPad (2025)

Compare →
vs

Mi 13 Lite vs Apple iPad (2025)

Compare →
vs

Galaxy A72 vs Pixel 6

Compare →
vs

Mi 13 Lite vs Google Pixel 10a 5G

Compare →
vs

Galaxy A72 vs OnePlus Nord N30 SE

Compare →

Gear for the Galaxy A72

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsAirPods Pro 3 vs Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs BoseWhich flagship earbuds fit your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsApple Watch vs Galaxy Watch vs Pixel WatchThe right watch for your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →