Galaxy F54 vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE: Which One Should You Buy?

Galaxy F54 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 83.1/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2023

Galaxy F54

Galaxy F54
83/ 100
Launch price$349
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
83/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Galaxy F54 wins 4 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy F54
Galaxy F54
4 wins
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Galaxy F54Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy F54
    80
    70
  • CameraGalaxy F54
    90
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryGalaxy F54
    96
    95
  • DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
    62
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueGalaxy F54
    90
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has the bigger battery6,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has the bigger screen10.1" vs 6.7"
  • Galaxy F54 has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
  • Galaxy F54 has the faster chipSamsung Exynos 1380 vs Helio G85
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy F54
  • ✓108 MP main camera
  • ✓6.7" display
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
  • ✓Bigger 6,600 mAh battery (+600 mAh)
  • ✓10.1" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy F54Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Wins Display
Screen typeNot listedAMOLED
Screen Size6.7"10.1"
Resolution & DensityN/A FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh RateNot listed120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy F54 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSamsung Exynos 1380 (5nm)Helio G85
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsMali-G68 MP5Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB128 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy F54 Wins Camera
Primary Camera108 MPundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens32 MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight199 gN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Galaxy F54 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,000 mAh6,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedNot listed
USB Port & SpeedNot listedNot listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$349Price on request
Our verdict

Galaxy F54 wins — BeastScore 83.1/100

The Galaxy F54 is the better pick for most people thanks to its more RAM (8 GB vs 6 GB) and faster chip (Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Helio G85). The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh).

Buy Galaxy F54 if you want

More RAM: 8 GB vs 6 GB

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE if you want

Larger battery: 6,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh · Larger display: 10.1" vs 6.7"

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy F54 or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

The Galaxy F54 is the better pick for most people thanks to its more RAM (8 GB vs 6 GB) and faster chip (Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Helio G85). The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh). BeastScore: Galaxy F54 83.1/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE 82.6/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy F54 and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

Galaxy F54 has a 6.7-inch display and 6000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has a 10.1-inch display and 6600 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy F54 and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE compare for speed?

Galaxy F54 scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE scores 70/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Galaxy F54

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →