Galaxy Folder2 vs Galaxy S III: Which One Should You Buy?
Galaxy S III edges ahead with a BeastScore of 62.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Galaxy S III wins 1 of 7 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie6060
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieTie4040
- BatteryTie5858
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityTie4040
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueGalaxy S III6880
- Galaxy S III has the bigger battery2,100 mAh vs 1,950 mAh
- Galaxy S III has the bigger screen4.8" vs 3.8"
- Galaxy S III is lighter133 g vs 165 g
- Galaxy Folder2 has a sharper selfie camera5 MP vs 1.9 MP
- Galaxy Folder2 has newer Bluetooth4.2 vs 4
- Galaxy Folder2 has more RAM2 GB vs 1 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Galaxy S III wins — BeastScore 62.0/100
The Galaxy S III is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (2,100 mAh vs 1,950 mAh) and bigger screen (4.8" vs 3.8"). The Galaxy Folder2 is worth a look if you prefer its sharper selfie camera (5 MP vs 1.9 MP).
Reliable all-round performance.
Larger display: 4.8" vs 3.8" · Lighter: 133 g vs 165 g (32 g less)
Common questions
Which is better: Galaxy Folder2 or Galaxy S III?
The Galaxy S III is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (2,100 mAh vs 1,950 mAh) and bigger screen (4.8" vs 3.8"). The Galaxy Folder2 is worth a look if you prefer its sharper selfie camera (5 MP vs 1.9 MP). BeastScore: Galaxy Folder2 60.8/100, Galaxy S III 62.0/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Folder2 and Galaxy S III?
Galaxy Folder2 has a 3.8-inch display and 1950 mAh battery. Galaxy S III has a 4.8-inch display and 2100 mAh battery.
How do Galaxy Folder2 and Galaxy S III compare for speed?
Galaxy Folder2 scores 60/100 for performance; Galaxy S III scores 60/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Galaxy Folder2 vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Galaxy S III vs Samsung SM-G1600 Galaxy Folder 2 Dual SIM TD-LTE 16GB (Samsung G160)
Galaxy Folder2 vs iPhone 6
Galaxy S III vs iPhone 6 Plus
Galaxy Folder2 vs Pixel
Galaxy S III vs Pixel
Galaxy Folder2 vs OnePlus One
Galaxy S III vs OnePlus One
Gear for the Galaxy S III
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?
Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.
Read →




