BeastCompare

Galaxy S23 vs SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q: Which One Should You Buy?

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q edges ahead with a BeastScore of 79.1/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2023

Galaxy S23

Galaxy S23
79/ 100
Launch price$799
Samsung · 2020

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
79/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Galaxy S23 wins 4 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy S23
Galaxy S23
4 wins
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Galaxy S23SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedSM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
    80
    90
  • CameraGalaxy S23
    91
    68
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieGalaxy S23
    60
    40
  • BatterySM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
    58
    78
  • DisplayGalaxy S23
    88
    86
  • ConnectivityGalaxy S23
    90
    55
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    68
    68
Key differences
  • SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q has the bigger battery4,500 mAh vs 3,900 mAh
  • Galaxy S23 has a sharper main camera50 MP vs 12.2 MP
  • SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q has the bigger screen6.22" vs 6.1"
  • Galaxy S23 is lighter168 g vs 282 g
  • Galaxy S23 has a sharper selfie camera12 MP vs 10 MP
  • Galaxy S23 has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5
  • SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy S23
  • ✓114 g lighter (168 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$9200 cheaper at launch ($799 vs $9999)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
Reasons to buy SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
  • ✓Bigger 4,500 mAh battery (+600 mAh)
  • ✓12.2 MP main camera
  • ✓6.22" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy S23SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
1. Display & Screen🏆 Galaxy S23 Wins Display
Screen typeDynamic AMOLED 2XAM-OLED display
Screen Size6.1"6.22"
Resolution & Density2340x1080 (425 ppi)816x2260 (386 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
Brightness1,750 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm)Not listed
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 740Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 13Android 10
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy S23 Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.8, OIS, Samsung GN312.2 MP
Telephoto Zoom10 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera12 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens12 MP, f/2.210 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Galaxy S23 Lightest Chassis
Dimensions146.3 x 70.9 x 7.6 mmN/A
Weight168 g282 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q Wins Battery
Battery Capacity3,900 mAh4,500 mAh
Wired Fast Charging25W wired fast charging25W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging15W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6ENot listed
Bluetooth5.3Bluetooth 5.0
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2USB C reversible
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$799Price on request
Our verdict

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q wins — BeastScore 79.1/100

After comparing all the specs, SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 79.1 vs top rival 78.8 and Larger battery capacity: 4,500 mAh (+600 mAh more).

Buy Galaxy S23 if you want

Higher resolution main sensor: 50 MP vs max 12.2 MP · Dedicated optical telephoto zoom (1 lens system)

Buy SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 79.1 vs top rival 78.8 · Larger battery capacity: 4,500 mAh (+600 mAh more)

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy S23 or SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q leads with an overall BeastScore of 79.1/100 compared to Galaxy S23 (78.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 79.1 vs top rival 78.8 and Larger battery capacity: 4,500 mAh (+600 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy S23 and SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?

Galaxy S23 has a 6.1-inch display and 3900 mAh battery. SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q has a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy S23 and SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q compare for speed?

Galaxy S23 scores 80/100 for performance; SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)

iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple

iPhone 16 Pro Max

Pixel 7a
Google

Pixel 7a

OnePlus Nord N20 SE
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N20 SE

Xiaomi Poco M5 (India)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Poco M5 (India)

vivo Y18e
Vivo

vivo Y18e

A80
Oppo

A80

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Galaxy S23 vs Galaxy S25

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S23 vs Galaxy S24

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S21 5G vs Galaxy S23

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S22 vs Galaxy S23

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S23 FE vs Galaxy S23

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Galaxy S23

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S23 vs Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)

Compare →
vs

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbersComparison
6 min read

Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers

A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read →