BeastCompare

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs POCO X7 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

These two are too close to call on BeastScore — the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2026

Galaxy S26 Ultra

Galaxy S26 Ultra
88/ 100
Launch price$1,299
Poco · 2025

POCO X7 Pro

POCO X7 Pro
88/ 100
Launch price$379
Head-to-head

Too close to call: 3 of 8 categories each

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy S26 Ultra
Galaxy S26 Ultra
3 wins
POCO X7 Pro
POCO X7 Pro
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
Galaxy S26 UltraPOCO X7 Pro
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy S26 Ultra
    90
    80
  • CameraGalaxy S26 Ultra
    100
    88
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfiePOCO X7 Pro
    60
    76
  • BatteryPOCO X7 Pro
    86
    98
  • DisplayTie
    90
    90
  • ConnectivityGalaxy S26 Ultra
    100
    68
  • SecurityTie
    100
    100
  • ValuePOCO X7 Pro
    55
    80
Key differences
  • POCO X7 Pro has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • POCO X7 Pro charges faster90W vs 60W
  • Galaxy S26 Ultra has a sharper main camera200 MP vs 50 MP
  • Galaxy S26 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.67"
  • POCO X7 Pro is lighter195 g vs 214 g
  • POCO X7 Pro launched cheaper$379 vs $1,299
  • POCO X7 Pro has a sharper selfie camera20 MP vs 12 MP
  • Galaxy S26 Ultra has newer Bluetooth6 vs 5.4
  • Galaxy S26 Ultra has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Galaxy S26 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Dimensity 8400
  • Galaxy S26 Ultra has faster Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • ✓200 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy POCO X7 Pro
  • ✓19 g lighter (195 g vs 214 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$920 cheaper at launch ($379 vs $1,299)
  • ✓Bigger 6,000 mAh battery (+1,000 mAh)

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy S26 UltraPOCO X7 Pro
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeDynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X (Privacy Display)AMOLED
Screen Size6.9"6.67"
Resolution & Density3120x1440 (501 ppi)2712x1220 (446 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz adaptive120 Hz
Brightness2,600 nits peak3,200 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy S26 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm)Dimensity 8400 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 840Mali-G720 MC7
Operating SystemAndroid 16Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB / 1024GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy S26 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera200 MP, f/1.4, OIS, Samsung HP250 MP, f/1.5, OIS, Light Fusion 800
Telephoto Zoom10 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4, OIS + 50 MP (5x optical zoom), f/2.9, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/28 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens12 MP, f/2.220 MP, f/2.2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 POCO X7 Pro Lightest Chassis
Dimensions163.6 x 78.1 x 7.9 mm160.8 x 75.2 x 8.4 mm
Weight214 g195 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68IP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 POCO X7 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging60W wired fast charging90W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging25W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth6.05.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,299$379
Our verdict

Galaxy S26 Ultra and POCO X7 Pro are evenly matched

It's a close call. Pick the Galaxy S26 Ultra for its sharper main camera (200 MP vs 50 MP) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.67"), or the POCO X7 Pro for its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and faster charging (90W vs 60W).

Buy Galaxy S26 Ultra if you want

Higher-resolution main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP · Optical telephoto zoom (2 telephoto lenses)

Buy POCO X7 Pro if you want

Larger battery: 6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Faster wired charging: 90W vs 60W

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy S26 Ultra or POCO X7 Pro?

It's a close call. Pick the Galaxy S26 Ultra for its sharper main camera (200 MP vs 50 MP) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.67"), or the POCO X7 Pro for its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and faster charging (90W vs 60W). BeastScore: Galaxy S26 Ultra 88.2/100, POCO X7 Pro 87.6/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy S26 Ultra and POCO X7 Pro?

Galaxy S26 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. POCO X7 Pro has a 6.67-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy S26 Ultra and POCO X7 Pro compare for speed?

Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 90/100 for performance; POCO X7 Pro scores 80/100.

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Galaxy S27 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S26+ vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S26 vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE 5G vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Compare →
vs

POCO X7 Pro vs Galaxy A37 5G

Compare →
vs

POCO X7 Pro vs Galaxy A36

Compare →

Gear for the Galaxy S26 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsAirPods Pro 3 vs Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs BoseWhich flagship earbuds fit your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsApple Watch vs Galaxy Watch vs Pixel WatchThe right watch for your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →