BeastCompare

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+: Which One Should You Buy?

Galaxy S26 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 88.2/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2026

Galaxy S26 Ultra

Galaxy S26 Ultra
88/ 100
Launch price$1,299
Vivo · 2024

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
88/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Galaxy S26 Ultra wins 4 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy S26 Ultra
Galaxy S26 Ultra
4 wins
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
Galaxy S26 Ultravivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • Speedvivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
    90
    91
  • CameraGalaxy S26 Ultra
    100
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • Batteryvivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
    86
    95
  • DisplayGalaxy S26 Ultra
    90
    89
  • ConnectivityGalaxy S26 Ultra
    100
    65
  • SecurityGalaxy S26 Ultra
    100
    34
  • Valuevivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
    55
    85
Key differences
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ has the bigger battery6,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ charges faster80W vs 60W
  • Galaxy S26 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.78"
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ is lighter194.9 g vs 214 g
  • Galaxy S26 Ultra has newer Bluetooth6 vs 5.4
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Galaxy S26 Ultra has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Dimensity 9300+
  • Galaxy S26 Ultra is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP64
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • ✓200 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
  • ✓19.099999999999994 g lighter (194.9 g vs 214 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 6,400 mAh battery (+1,400 mAh)
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy S26 Ultravivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
1. Display & Screen🏆 Galaxy S26 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeDynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X (Privacy Display)AMOLED
Screen Size6.9"6.78"
Resolution & Density3120x1440 (501 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (453 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz adaptive120 Hz
Brightness2,600 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm)Dimensity 9300+
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 840Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 16Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB / 1024GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy S26 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera200 MP, f/1.4, OIS, Samsung HP2undefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto Zoom10 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4, OIS + 50 MP (5x optical zoom), f/2.9, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens12 MP, f/2.2undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ Lightest Chassis
Dimensions163.6 x 78.1 x 7.9 mmN/A
Weight214 g194.9 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68IP64
8. Battery & Charging🏆 vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh6,400 mAh
Wired Fast Charging60W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless Charging25W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Not listed
Bluetooth6.0v5.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,299Price on request
Our verdict

Galaxy S26 Ultra wins — BeastScore 88.2/100

The Galaxy S26 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.78") and newer Bluetooth (6 vs 5.4). The vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (6,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh).

Buy Galaxy S26 Ultra if you want

Optical telephoto zoom (2 telephoto lenses)

Buy vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ if you want

Larger battery: 6,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Faster wired charging: 80W vs 60W

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy S26 Ultra or vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+?

The Galaxy S26 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.78") and newer Bluetooth (6 vs 5.4). The vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (6,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). BeastScore: Galaxy S26 Ultra 88.2/100, vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ 88.1/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy S26 Ultra and vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+?

Galaxy S26 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ has a 6.78-inch display and 6400 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy S26 Ultra and vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ compare for speed?

Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 90/100 for performance; vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ scores 91/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy A27 5G

Apple iPhone Duo
Apple

Apple iPhone Duo

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro 5G

OnePlus 13s
Oneplus

OnePlus 13s

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Special Edition 5G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Special Edition 5G

vivo iQOO Z11i 5G
Vivo

vivo iQOO Z11i 5G

Oppo Find N5
Oppo

Oppo Find N5

Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 50 Pro

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Galaxy S27 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S26+ vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy S26 vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE 5G vs Galaxy S26 Ultra

Compare →
vs

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ vs vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G

Compare →
vs

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ vs vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance

Compare →

Gear for the Galaxy S26 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsAirPods Pro 3 vs Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs BoseWhich flagship earbuds fit your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsApple Watch vs Galaxy Watch vs Pixel WatchThe right watch for your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →