Galaxy S III vs Motorola Razr (2019): Which One Should You Buy?
Motorola Razr (2019) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 64.5/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Motorola Razr (2019) wins 3 of 7 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedMotorola Razr (2019)6072
- CameraMotorola Razr (2019)6068
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieTie4040
- BatteryTie5858
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityMotorola Razr (2019)5264
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueGalaxy S III8055
- Motorola Razr (2019) has the bigger battery2,510 mAh vs 2,100 mAh
- Motorola Razr (2019) charges faster15W vs 5W
- Motorola Razr (2019) has a sharper main camera16 MP vs 8 MP
- Motorola Razr (2019) has the bigger screen6.2" vs 4.8"
- Galaxy S III is lighter133 g vs 205 g
- Galaxy S III launched cheaper$599 vs $1,500
- Motorola Razr (2019) has a sharper selfie camera5 MP vs 1.9 MP
- Motorola Razr (2019) has newer Bluetooth5 vs 4
- Motorola Razr (2019) has more RAM6 GB vs 1 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Motorola Razr (2019) wins — BeastScore 64.5/100
The Motorola Razr (2019) is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (2,510 mAh vs 2,100 mAh) and faster charging (15W vs 5W). The Galaxy S III is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (133 g vs 205 g).
Lighter: 133 g vs 205 g (72 g less) · Lower launch price: $599 vs $1,500
Larger battery: 2,510 mAh vs 2,100 mAh · Faster wired charging: 15W vs 5W
Common questions
Which is better: Galaxy S III or Motorola Razr (2019)?
The Motorola Razr (2019) is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (2,510 mAh vs 2,100 mAh) and faster charging (15W vs 5W). The Galaxy S III is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (133 g vs 205 g). BeastScore: Galaxy S III 62.0/100, Motorola Razr (2019) 64.5/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy S III and Motorola Razr (2019)?
Galaxy S III has a 4.8-inch display and 2100 mAh battery. Motorola Razr (2019) has a 6.2-inch display and 2510 mAh battery.
How do Galaxy S III and Motorola Razr (2019) compare for speed?
Galaxy S III scores 60/100 for performance; Motorola Razr (2019) scores 72/100.
Similar Smartphones

Galaxy S9

iPhone 13
Pixel 3

OnePlus One

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Galaxy S III vs Galaxy Folder2
Motorola Razr (2019) vs Galaxy S9
Galaxy S III vs iPhone 6 Plus
Motorola Razr (2019) vs iPhone 13
Galaxy S III vs Pixel
Motorola Razr (2019) vs Pixel 3
Galaxy S III vs OnePlus One
Motorola Razr (2019) vs OnePlus One
Gear for the Motorola Razr (2019)
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?
Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.
Read →