Galaxy S9+ vs Motorola Razr (2019): Which One Should You Buy?

Galaxy S9+ edges ahead with a BeastScore of 67.5/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2018

Galaxy S9+

Galaxy S9+
68/ 100
Launch price$840
Motorola · 2020

Motorola Razr (2019)

Motorola Razr (2019)
65/ 100
Launch price$1,500
Head-to-head

Galaxy S9+ wins 3 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy S9+
Galaxy S9+
3 wins
Motorola Razr (2019)
Motorola Razr (2019)
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Galaxy S9+Motorola Razr (2019)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    72
    72
  • CameraGalaxy S9+
    75
    68
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieTie
    40
    40
  • BatteryTie
    58
    58
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityGalaxy S9+
    65
    53
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueGalaxy S9+
    68
    55
Key differences
  • Galaxy S9+ has the bigger battery3,500 mAh vs 2,510 mAh
  • Motorola Razr (2019) has a sharper main camera16 MP vs 12 MP
  • Galaxy S9+ is lighter189 g vs 205 g
  • Galaxy S9+ launched cheaper$840 vs $1,500
  • Galaxy S9+ has a sharper selfie camera8 MP vs 5 MP
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy S9+
  • ✓16 g lighter (189 g vs 205 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$660 cheaper at launch ($840 vs $1,500)
  • ✓Bigger 3,500 mAh battery (+990 mAh)
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr (2019)
  • ✓16 MP main camera
  • ✓6.2" display at 60 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy S9+Motorola Razr (2019)
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeSuper AMOLEDP-OLED (foldable)
Screen Size6.2"6.2"
Resolution & Density2960x1440 (529 ppi)2142x876 (373 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness864 nits peak450 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorNot listed Not listed
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 8.0Android 9
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage64GB / 128GB / 256GB128GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy S9+ Wins Camera
Primary Camera12 MP, f/1.5, OIS16 MP, f/1.7
Telephoto Zoom12 MP (2x optical zoom), f/2.4, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens8 MP, f/1.75 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Galaxy S9+ Lightest Chassis
Dimensions158.1 x 73.8 x 8.5 mm172 x 72 x 6.9 mm
Weight189 g205 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68Not listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity3,500 mAh2,510 mAh
Wired Fast Charging15W wired fast charging15W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging10W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.0
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.1USB-C 2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$840$1,500
Our verdict

Galaxy S9+ wins — BeastScore 67.5/100

The Galaxy S9+ is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (3,500 mAh vs 2,510 mAh) and lighter body (189 g vs 205 g). The Motorola Razr (2019) is worth a look if you prefer its sharper main camera (16 MP vs 12 MP).

Buy Galaxy S9+ if you want

Larger battery: 3,500 mAh vs 2,510 mAh · Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens)

Buy Motorola Razr (2019) if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy S9+ or Motorola Razr (2019)?

The Galaxy S9+ is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (3,500 mAh vs 2,510 mAh) and lighter body (189 g vs 205 g). The Motorola Razr (2019) is worth a look if you prefer its sharper main camera (16 MP vs 12 MP). BeastScore: Galaxy S9+ 67.5/100, Motorola Razr (2019) 64.5/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy S9+ and Motorola Razr (2019)?

Galaxy S9+ has a 6.2-inch display and 3500 mAh battery. Motorola Razr (2019) has a 6.2-inch display and 2510 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy S9+ and Motorola Razr (2019) compare for speed?

Galaxy S9+ scores 72/100 for performance; Motorola Razr (2019) scores 72/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Galaxy S9+

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →