Galaxy Z Fold4 vs Oppo A6c (China): Which One Should You Buy?

These two are too close to call on BeastScore — the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2022

Galaxy Z Fold4

Galaxy Z Fold4
82/ 100
Launch price$1,799
Oppo · 2026

Oppo A6c (China)

Oppo A6c (China)
82/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Too close to call: 3 of 6 categories each

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy Z Fold4
Galaxy Z Fold4
3 wins
Oppo A6c (China)
Oppo A6c (China)
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Galaxy Z Fold4Oppo A6c (China)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy Z Fold4
    90
    70
  • CameraGalaxy Z Fold4
    91
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryOppo A6c (China)
    70
    95
  • DisplayOppo A6c (China)
    88
    89
  • ConnectivityGalaxy Z Fold4
    80
    55
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueOppo A6c (China)
    55
    85
Key differences
  • Oppo A6c (China) has the bigger battery6,500 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
  • Galaxy Z Fold4 has the bigger screen7.6" vs 6.75"
  • Oppo A6c (China) is lighter215 g vs 263 g
  • Galaxy Z Fold4 has more RAM12 GB vs 6 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Z Fold4
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓7.6" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Oppo A6c (China)
  • ✓48 g lighter (215 g vs 263 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 6,500 mAh battery (+2,100 mAh)
  • ✓6.75" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Z Fold4Oppo A6c (China)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Oppo A6c (China) Wins Display
Screen typeDynamic AMOLED 2XColor LCD Screen
Screen Size7.6"6.75"
Resolution & Density2176x1812 (374 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
Brightness1,500 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy Z Fold4 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)Snapdragon 685
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 730Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 12Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB / 1024GB128 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy Z Fold4 Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.8, OISundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto Zoom10 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera12 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens10 MP, f/2.2undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Oppo A6c (China) Lightest Chassis
Dimensions155.1 x 130.1 x 6.3 mmN/A
Weight263 g215 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIPX8Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Oppo A6c (China) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,400 mAh6,500 mAh
Wired Fast Charging25W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless Charging15W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6EYes, with wifi-hotspot
Bluetooth5.2Yes, v5.2, SBC, AAC, LDAC
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2Yes, USB-C v2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,799Price on request
Our verdict

Galaxy Z Fold4 and Oppo A6c (China) are evenly matched

It's a close call. Pick the Galaxy Z Fold4 for its bigger screen (7.6" vs 6.75") and more RAM (12 GB vs 6 GB), or the Oppo A6c (China) for its bigger battery (6,500 mAh vs 4,400 mAh) and lighter body (215 g vs 263 g).

Buy Galaxy Z Fold4 if you want

Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens) · Larger display: 7.6" vs 6.75"

Buy Oppo A6c (China) if you want

Larger battery: 6,500 mAh vs 4,400 mAh · Lighter: 215 g vs 263 g (48 g less)

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy Z Fold4 or Oppo A6c (China)?

It's a close call. Pick the Galaxy Z Fold4 for its bigger screen (7.6" vs 6.75") and more RAM (12 GB vs 6 GB), or the Oppo A6c (China) for its bigger battery (6,500 mAh vs 4,400 mAh) and lighter body (215 g vs 263 g). BeastScore: Galaxy Z Fold4 82.3/100, Oppo A6c (China) 81.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Z Fold4 and Oppo A6c (China)?

Galaxy Z Fold4 has a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery. Oppo A6c (China) has a 6.75-inch display and 6500 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy Z Fold4 and Oppo A6c (China) compare for speed?

Galaxy Z Fold4 scores 90/100 for performance; Oppo A6c (China) scores 70/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Galaxy Z Fold4

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →