Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2024

Galaxy Z Fold6

Galaxy Z Fold6
83/ 100
Launch price$1,899
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
83/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy Z Fold6
Galaxy Z Fold6
2 wins
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Galaxy Z Fold6Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy Z Fold6
    90
    70
  • CameraGalaxy Z Fold6
    91
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
    70
    95
  • DisplayXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
    90
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
    55
    85
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has the bigger battery6,600 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has the bigger screen10.1" vs 7.6"
  • Galaxy Z Fold6 has more RAM12 GB vs 6 GB
  • Galaxy Z Fold6 has the faster chipSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Helio G85
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Z Fold6
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓7.6" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
  • ✓Bigger 6,600 mAh battery (+2,200 mAh)
  • ✓10.1" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Z Fold6Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Wins Display
Screen typeDynamic AMOLED 2XAMOLED
Screen Size7.6"10.1"
Resolution & Density2160x1856 (374 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
Brightness2,600 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy Z Fold6 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)Helio G85
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 750Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB / 1024GB128 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy Z Fold6 Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.8, OIS, Samsung GN3undefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto Zoom10 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera12 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens10 MP, f/2.2undefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
Dimensions153.5 x 132.6 x 5.6 mmN/A
Weight239 gN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIPX8Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,400 mAh6,600 mAh
Wired Fast Charging25W wired fast chargingFast charging
Wireless Charging15W wireless chargingNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7Not listed
Bluetooth5.3Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 3.2Not listed
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,899Price on request
Our verdict

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE wins — BeastScore 82.6/100

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 4,400 mAh) and bigger screen (10.1" vs 7.6"). The Galaxy Z Fold6 is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Buy Galaxy Z Fold6 if you want

Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens) · More RAM: 12 GB vs 6 GB

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE if you want

Larger battery: 6,600 mAh vs 4,400 mAh · Larger display: 10.1" vs 7.6"

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy Z Fold6 or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

The Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 4,400 mAh) and bigger screen (10.1" vs 7.6"). The Galaxy Z Fold6 is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 6 GB). BeastScore: Galaxy Z Fold6 82.8/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE 82.6/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Z Fold6 and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

Galaxy Z Fold6 has a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has a 10.1-inch display and 6600 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy Z Fold6 and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE compare for speed?

Galaxy Z Fold6 scores 90/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE scores 70/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →