Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs RedMagic 12 Pro+: Which One Should You Buy?

RedMagic 12 Pro+ edges ahead with a BeastScore of 94.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2026

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
94/ 100
Launch price$1,799
RedMagic · 2026

RedMagic 12 Pro+

RedMagic 12 Pro+
94/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

RedMagic 12 Pro+ wins 3 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
2 wins
RedMagic 12 Pro+
RedMagic 12 Pro+
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplaySecurity
Galaxy Z Fold8 UltraRedMagic 12 Pro+
Category winners

Scores out of 100. "From specs" scores compare only the specs both phones list. How we score

  • Speedfrom specsGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
    98
    97
  • Camerafrom specsGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
    89
    66
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieRedMagic 12 Pro+
    40
    60
  • Batteryfrom specsRedMagic 12 Pro+
    60
    100
  • Displayfrom specsTie
    94
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityRedMagic 12 Pro+
    14
    100
  • ValueNot enough data
Key differences
  • RedMagic 12 Pro+ has the bigger battery8,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • RedMagic 12 Pro+ charges faster120W vs 45W
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a sharper main camera200 MP vs 50 MP
  • RedMagic 12 Pro+ has a smoother screen185 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the bigger screen8" vs 6.85"
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is lighter215 g vs 223 g
  • RedMagic 12 Pro+ has a sharper selfie camera16 MP vs 10 MP
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
  • RedMagic 12 Pro+ is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP48
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • ✓8 g lighter (215 g vs 223 g), easier to hold
  • ✓200 MP main camera
  • ✓8" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy RedMagic 12 Pro+
  • ✓Bigger 8,400 mAh battery (+3,400 mAh)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.85" display at 185 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Z Fold8 UltraRedMagic 12 Pro+
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)AMOLED
Screen Size8"6.85"
Resolution & Density2256 x 2504 pixels (~422 ppi) (422 ppi)1216x2688
Refresh Rate120 Hz adaptive185 Hz
Brightness1432 nits (measured)5,000 nits peak
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3 / Flex TitaniumNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 17, One UI 9 (7 major OS updates) 17Android 17
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB / 1TB256/512/1024 GB
Storage SpeedUFS 4.xNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", OIS, multi-directional PDAF, OIS50 MP, OIS
Telephoto Zoom10 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4, 67mm, OISNone (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/1.9, 120˚ (ultrawide)50 MP
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
8K@30fps4K@30/60/120fps1080p@240fps10-bit HDRHDR10+gyro-EISOIS
Not listed
Front Video
4K@30/60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens10 MP, f/2.2, 18mm (ultrawide)16 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Lightest Chassis
DimensionsUnfolded: 158.4 x 143.2 x 4.1 mm, Folded: 158.4 x 72.8 x 8.9 mm163 x 76 x 8.6 mm
Weight215 g223 g
Build MaterialsGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3) folded, plastic front unfolded, glass back, aluminum frameNot listed
SIM TypeNano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (dual active)Not listed
Water ResistanceIP48 dust and water resistantIP68/IP69
8. Battery & Charging🏆 RedMagic 12 Pro+ Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh8,400 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast charging120W
Wireless Charging20W wireless charging80W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerYes, with stereo speakersNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 (802.11be, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct)Not listed
Bluetooth6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HDNot listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 3.2, OTGNot listed
NFCYes (Samsung Pay Visa, MasterCard certified)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,799Price on request
Our verdict

RedMagic 12 Pro+ wins — BeastScore 94.0/100

The RedMagic 12 Pro+ is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and faster charging (120W vs 45W). The Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its sharper main camera (200 MP vs 50 MP).

Buy Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra if you want

Higher-resolution main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP · Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens)

Buy RedMagic 12 Pro+ if you want

Larger battery: 8,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh · Faster wired charging: 120W vs 45W

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or RedMagic 12 Pro+?

The RedMagic 12 Pro+ is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (8,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh) and faster charging (120W vs 45W). The Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is worth a look if you prefer its sharper main camera (200 MP vs 50 MP). BeastScore: Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 94.2/100, RedMagic 12 Pro+ 94.0/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and RedMagic 12 Pro+?

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a 8-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. RedMagic 12 Pro+ has a 6.85-inch display and 8400 mAh battery.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the RedMagic 12 Pro+

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →