BeastCompare

Galaxy Z Fold8 vs Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 94.2/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2026

Galaxy Z Fold8

Galaxy Z Fold8
92/ 100
Launch price$1,649
Samsung · 2026

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
94/ 100
Launch price$1,799
Head-to-head

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra wins 5 of 9 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy Z Fold8
Galaxy Z Fold8
1 win
Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
5 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraVideoSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
Galaxy Z Fold8Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
    96
    98
  • CameraGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
    92
    96
  • VideoGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
    65
    85
  • SelfieTie
    58
    58
  • BatteryGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
    86
    89
  • DisplayGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
    95
    98
  • ConnectivityTie
    100
    100
  • SecurityTie
    45
    45
  • ValueGalaxy Z Fold8
    60
    56
Key differences
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a sharper main camera200 MP vs 50 MP
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the bigger screen8" vs 7.6"
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 is lighter201 g vs 215 g
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 launched cheaper$1,649 vs $1,799
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Z Fold8
  • ✓14 g lighter (201 g vs 215 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$150 cheaper at launch ($1,649 vs $1,799)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
Reasons to buy Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+200 mAh)
  • ✓200 MP main camera
  • ✓8" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Z Fold8Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)
Screen Size7.6"8"
Resolution & Density2448 x 1848 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~404 ppi) (404 ppi)2256 x 2504 pixels (~422 ppi) (422 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz adaptive120 Hz adaptive
Brightness1525 nits (measured)1432 nits (measured)
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3 / Flex TitaniumCorning Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3 / Flex Titanium
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 17, One UI 9 (7 major OS updates) 17Android 17, One UI 9 (7 major OS updates) 17
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB / 1TB256GB / 512GB / 1TB
Storage SpeedUFS 4.xUFS 4.x
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", OIS, dual pixel PDAF, OIS200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", OIS, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)10 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.4, 67mm, OIS
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/1.9, 120˚ (ultrawide)50 MP, f/1.9, 120˚ (ultrawide)
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
8K@30fps4K@30/60/120fps1080p@240fpsgyro-EISOIS
8K@30fps4K@30/60/120fps1080p@240fps10-bit HDRHDR10+gyro-EISOIS
Front Video
4K@30/60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@30/60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens10 MP, f/2.2, 18mm (ultrawide)10 MP, f/2.2, 18mm (ultrawide)
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsUnfolded: 161.4 x 123.9 x 4.5 mm, Folded: 81.9 x 123.9 x 9.7 mmUnfolded: 158.4 x 143.2 x 4.1 mm, Folded: 158.4 x 72.8 x 8.9 mm
Weight201 g215 g
Build MaterialsGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3) folded, plastic front unfolded, glass back, aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3) folded, plastic front unfolded, glass back, aluminum frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (dual active)Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (dual active)
Water ResistanceIP48 dust and water resistantIP48 dust and water resistant
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,800 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast charging45W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging20W wireless charging20W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerYes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 (802.11be, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct)Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct)
Bluetooth6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 3.2, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
NFCYes (Samsung Pay Visa, MasterCard certified)Yes (Samsung Pay Visa, MasterCard certified)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,649$1,799
Our verdict

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra wins — BeastScore 94.2/100

The Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh) and sharper main camera (200 MP vs 50 MP). The Galaxy Z Fold8 is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (201 g vs 215 g).

Buy Galaxy Z Fold8 if you want

Lighter: 201 g vs 215 g (14 g less) · Lower launch price: $1,649 vs $1,799

Buy Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra if you want

Larger battery: 5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh · Higher-resolution main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy Z Fold8 or Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh) and sharper main camera (200 MP vs 50 MP). The Galaxy Z Fold8 is worth a look if you prefer its lighter body (201 g vs 215 g). BeastScore: Galaxy Z Fold8 91.8/100, Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 94.2/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Z Fold8 and Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

Galaxy Z Fold8 has a 7.6-inch display and 4800 mAh battery. Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a 8-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy Z Fold8 and Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra compare for speed?

Galaxy Z Fold8 scores 96/100 for performance; Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 98/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5G
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5G

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

OnePlus 16
Oneplus

OnePlus 16

Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Xiaomi

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Vivo X300s
Vivo

Vivo X300s

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 5G
Oppo

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 5G

Motorola Razr Fold 5G
Motorola

Motorola Razr Fold 5G

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr Fold 5G vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold8 vs Pixel 10 Pro Fold

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold8 vs Apple iPhone Duo

Compare →
vs

Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold8 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

Compare →

Gear for the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsAirPods Pro 3 vs Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs BoseWhich flagship earbuds fit your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsApple Watch vs Galaxy Watch vs Pixel WatchThe right watch for your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →