BeastCompare

Galaxy Z Fold8 vs Vivo X300 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Vivo X300 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.2/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung · 2026

Galaxy Z Fold8

Galaxy Z Fold8
92/ 100
Launch price$1,649
Vivo · 2026

Vivo X300 Ultra

Vivo X300 Ultra
92/ 100
Launch price$1,992
Head-to-head

Vivo X300 Ultra wins 4 of 8 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Galaxy Z Fold8
Galaxy Z Fold8
3 wins
Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra
4 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
Galaxy Z Fold8Vivo X300 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedGalaxy Z Fold8
    96
    95
  • CameraVivo X300 Ultra
    92
    100
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieVivo X300 Ultra
    40
    100
  • BatteryVivo X300 Ultra
    86
    100
  • DisplayGalaxy Z Fold8
    95
    90
  • ConnectivityTie
    100
    100
  • SecurityVivo X300 Ultra
    14
    100
  • ValueGalaxy Z Fold8
    60
    55
Key differences
  • Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery6,600 mAh vs 4,800 mAh
  • Vivo X300 Ultra charges faster100W vs 45W
  • Vivo X300 Ultra has a sharper main camera200 MP vs 50 MP
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 has the bigger screen7.6" vs 6.82"
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 is lighter201 g vs 235 g
  • Galaxy Z Fold8 launched cheaper$1,649 vs $1,992
  • Vivo X300 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera50 MP vs 10 MP
  • Vivo X300 Ultra is better protected from water and dustIP69 vs IP48
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Z Fold8
  • ✓34 g lighter (201 g vs 235 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$343 cheaper at launch ($1,649 vs $1,992)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
Reasons to buy Vivo X300 Ultra
  • ✓Bigger 6,600 mAh battery (+1,800 mAh)
  • ✓200 MP main camera
  • ✓6.82" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Z Fold8Vivo X300 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Wins Display
Screen typeFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED
Screen Size7.6"6.82"
Resolution & Density2448 x 1848 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~404 ppi) (404 ppi)3168x1440 (510 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz adaptive120 Hz adaptive
Brightness1525 nits (measured)4,500 nits peak
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3 / Flex TitaniumNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedAdreno 840
Operating SystemAndroid 17, One UI 9 (7 major OS updates) 17Android 16
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB / 1TB256GB / 512GB / 1024GB
Storage SpeedUFS 4.xNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Vivo X300 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", OIS, dual pixel PDAF, OIS200 MP, f/1.6, OIS, Sony LYT-901
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)200 MP (3.7x optical zoom), f/2.5, OIS
Ultrawide Camera50 MP, f/1.9, 120˚ (ultrawide)50 MP, f/2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
8K@30fps4K@30/60/120fps1080p@240fpsgyro-EISOIS
Not listed
Front Video
4K@30/60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens10 MP, f/2.2, 18mm (ultrawide)50 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Galaxy Z Fold8 Lightest Chassis
DimensionsUnfolded: 161.4 x 123.9 x 4.5 mm, Folded: 81.9 x 123.9 x 9.7 mm163.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm
Weight201 g235 g
Build MaterialsGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus Ceramic 3) folded, plastic front unfolded, glass back, aluminum frameNot listed
SIM TypeNano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (dual active)Not listed
Water ResistanceIP48 dust and water resistantIP69
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Vivo X300 Ultra Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,800 mAh6,600 mAh
Wired Fast Charging45W wired fast charging100W wired fast charging
Wireless Charging20W wireless charging40W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerYes, with stereo speakersNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 (802.11be, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD6.0
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 3.2, OTGUSB-C 3.2
NFCYes (Samsung Pay Visa, MasterCard certified)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$1,649$1,992
Our verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins — BeastScore 92.2/100

The Vivo X300 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 4,800 mAh) and faster charging (100W vs 45W). The Galaxy Z Fold8 is worth a look if you prefer its bigger screen (7.6" vs 6.82").

Buy Galaxy Z Fold8 if you want

Larger display: 7.6" vs 6.82" · Lighter: 201 g vs 235 g (34 g less)

Buy Vivo X300 Ultra if you want

Larger battery: 6,600 mAh vs 4,800 mAh · Faster wired charging: 100W vs 45W

Common questions

Which is better: Galaxy Z Fold8 or Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,600 mAh vs 4,800 mAh) and faster charging (100W vs 45W). The Galaxy Z Fold8 is worth a look if you prefer its bigger screen (7.6" vs 6.82"). BeastScore: Galaxy Z Fold8 91.8/100, Vivo X300 Ultra 92.2/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Galaxy Z Fold8 and Vivo X300 Ultra?

Galaxy Z Fold8 has a 7.6-inch display and 4800 mAh battery. Vivo X300 Ultra has a 6.82-inch display and 6600 mAh battery.

How do Galaxy Z Fold8 and Vivo X300 Ultra compare for speed?

Galaxy Z Fold8 scores 96/100 for performance; Vivo X300 Ultra scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

Apple iPhone Duo
Apple

Apple iPhone Duo

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google

Google Pixel 9 Pro

OnePlus 12R
Oneplus

OnePlus 12R

Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Xiaomi

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Vivo X300s
Vivo

Vivo X300s

Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Oppo

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ 5G
Motorola

Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ 5G

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr Fold 5G vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold8 vs Pixel 10 Pro Fold

Compare →
vs

Galaxy Z Fold8 vs Apple iPhone Duo

Compare →
vs

vivo X200 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Vivo X300 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Compare →

Gear for the Vivo X300 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks Amazon FindsBest wireless earbudsTop 5 on Amazon, compared.See the picks Amazon FindsBest Bluetooth trackersAirTag vs SmartTag2 vs Tile.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →