BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Google

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
82/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G

Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
82/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldWinner 🏆
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORGoogle PixelSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity4,650 mAh6,000 mAh+6,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/A50 MP50 MP
Screen Display Size8"6.7"8"
Chassis Weight257gN/A257g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold:
  • 742g lighter chassis (257g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 8" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G:
  • Larger 6,000 mAh battery capacity (+1,350 mAh more capacity)
  • 50MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • 6.7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldSamsung Galaxy M17e 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 14, up to 15
socGoogle Tensor G4
ram gb16
camerasmain, selfie
displayFoldable LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2700 nits (peak) 8" (2076x2152 pixels) 374 PPI(FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED)
weight g257
os version14
battery mah4650
release date2024-08-01
storage options gb256, 512
cameramain: Triple Camera System, front: Selfie Camera
batterycapacity: 6000 mAh, charging: Fast charging
softwareos: Android
performanceram: 6GB, chipset: Dimensity 6300, storage: 128 GB
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold:
Higher overall BeastScore: 82.0 vs top rival 81.8 · Significantly larger display: 8" vs max 6.7" for media & multitasking
When to choose Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G:
Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,350 mAh more) · Higher resolution main sensor: 50 MP vs max 0 MP
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G

Which is better: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G?

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads with an overall BeastScore of 82.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G (81.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 82.0 vs top rival 81.8 and Significantly larger display: 8" vs max 6.7" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G?

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is equipped with a 8-inch display and 4650 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G features a 6.7-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G scores 70/100.