Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) vs Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7): Which One Should You Buy?
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)9095
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryGoogle Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)7870
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) has the bigger battery4,821 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
- Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) has the bigger screen7.57" vs 6.49"
- Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) is lighter215 g vs 283 g
- Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
- Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AC vs Google Tensor G2
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) wins — BeastScore 72.3/100
After comparing all the specs, Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,821 mAh (+421 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,821 mAh (+421 mAh more)
More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB · Lighter body: 215g (68g lighter in hand)
Common questions
Which is better: Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) or Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)?
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.3/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) (72.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,821 mAh (+421 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) and Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)?
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) has a 7.57-inch display and 4821 mAh battery. Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) has a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) and Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) compare for speed?
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) scores 90/100 for performance; Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) scores 95/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)
iPhone 16
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A)
Oppo Reno10 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU V3 256GB CPH2521 (BBK 2521)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) vs iPhone 16
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs iPhone 16
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Related articles
All articles →
MarketTrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026
TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.
Read →
TeaserMotorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone Duo
Motorola has published official teaser sketches of an upcoming wide-format book-style foldable aimed at competing directly with the iPhone Duo and Galaxy Fold.
Read →
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Read →