BeastCompare

Honor Magic4 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 81.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Honor · 2022

Honor Magic4 Lite

Honor Magic4 Lite
82/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Samsung · 2026

Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G

Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
82/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G wins 2 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Honor Magic4 Lite
Honor Magic4 Lite
1 win
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Honor Magic4 LiteSamsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedHonor Magic4 Lite
    79
    70
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatterySamsung Galaxy M17e 5G
    80
    95
  • DisplayTie
    89
    89
  • ConnectivitySamsung Galaxy M17e 5G
    55
    65
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh
  • Honor Magic4 Lite has the bigger screen6.81" vs 6.7"
  • Honor Magic4 Lite is lighter189 g vs 199 g
  • Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1
  • Honor Magic4 Lite has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Honor Magic4 Lite
  • ✓10 g lighter (189 g vs 199 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.81" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
  • ✓Bigger 6,000 mAh battery (+1,200 mAh)
  • ✓6.7" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationHonor Magic4 LiteSamsung Galaxy M17e 5G
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeIPS LCD, 120HzColor PLS LCD Screen (16M Colors)
Screen Size6.81"6.7"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Honor Magic4 Lite Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 695 5G Dimensity 6300
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 11Android 16
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128 GB128 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Honor Magic4 Lite Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight189 g199 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,800 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectYes, with wifi-hotspot
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LEYes, v5.3
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGYes, USB-C v2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G wins — BeastScore 81.8/100

The Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh) and newer Bluetooth (5.3 vs 5.1). The Honor Magic4 Lite is worth a look if you prefer its bigger screen (6.81" vs 6.7").

Buy Honor Magic4 Lite if you want

More RAM: 8 GB vs 6 GB · Lighter: 189 g vs 199 g (10 g less)

Buy Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G if you want

Larger battery: 6,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh

Common questions

Which is better: Honor Magic4 Lite or Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh) and newer Bluetooth (5.3 vs 5.1). The Honor Magic4 Lite is worth a look if you prefer its bigger screen (6.81" vs 6.7"). BeastScore: Honor Magic4 Lite 81.5/100, Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G 81.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Honor Magic4 Lite and Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G?

Honor Magic4 Lite has a 6.81-inch display and 4800 mAh battery. Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G has a 6.7-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.

How do Honor Magic4 Lite and Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G compare for speed?

Honor Magic4 Lite scores 79/100 for performance; Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G scores 70/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE 5G
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE 5G

Apple iPad (2025)
Apple

Apple iPad (2025)

Google Pixel 10a 5G
Google

Google Pixel 10a 5G

OnePlus N6x
Oneplus

OnePlus N6x

Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro

vivo iQOO Z11 Lite 5G
Vivo

vivo iQOO Z11 Lite 5G

Oppo A6c (China)
Oppo

Oppo A6c (China)

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Honor Magic4 Lite vs Honor Magic5 Lite

Compare →
vs

Honor Magic4 Lite vs Honor Magic6 Lite

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M17 5G

Compare →
vs

Honor Magic4 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy S26 FE 5G

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S26 FE 5G

Compare →
vs

Honor Magic4 Lite vs Apple iPad (2025)

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G vs Apple iPad (2025)

Compare →
vs

Honor Magic4 Lite vs Google Pixel 10a 5G

Compare →

Gear for the Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsAirPods Pro 3 vs Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs BoseWhich flagship earbuds fit your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsApple Watch vs Galaxy Watch vs Pixel WatchThe right watch for your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →