Honor X40 GT Racing vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Honor · 2023

Honor X40 GT Racing

Honor X40 GT Racing
84/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Motorola · 2024

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
84/ 100
Launch price$1,099
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins 4 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Honor X40 GT Racing
Honor X40 GT Racing
2 wins
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
4 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Honor X40 GT RacingMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    86
    90
  • CameraMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    80
    88
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryHonor X40 GT Racing
    80
    70
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    89
    100
  • ConnectivityMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
    55
    65
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueHonor X40 GT Racing
    85
    55
Key differences
  • Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery4,800 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a smoother screen165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has the bigger screen6.9" vs 6.81"
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is lighter189 g vs 199.5 g
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Honor X40 GT Racing
  • ✓Bigger 4,800 mAh battery (+800 mAh)
  • ✓6.81" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
  • ✓10.5 g lighter (189 g vs 199.5 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.9" display at 165 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationHonor X40 GT RacingMotorola Razr 50 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeColor TFT LCD (16M Colors)pOLED
Screen Size6.81"6.9"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED 2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz165 Hz
BrightnessN/A3,000 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon / MediaTek Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedAdreno 735
Operating SystemAndroid 13Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera System50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Sony LYT-700C
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A50 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MP32 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A171.3 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight199.5 g189 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP48
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Honor X40 GT Racing Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,800 mAh4,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast charging45W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed15W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardYes, with wifi-hotspotWi-Fi 7
BluetoothYes, v5.25.4
USB Port & SpeedYes, USB-C v2.0USB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$1,099
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins — BeastScore 84.0/100

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.81"). The Honor X40 GT Racing is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,800 mAh vs 4,000 mAh).

Buy Honor X40 GT Racing if you want

Larger battery: 4,800 mAh vs 4,000 mAh

Buy Motorola Razr 50 Ultra if you want

Smoother display: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz · Lighter: 189 g vs 199.5 g (11 g less)

Common questions

Which is better: Honor X40 GT Racing or Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better pick for most people thanks to its smoother screen (165 Hz vs 120 Hz) and bigger screen (6.9" vs 6.81"). The Honor X40 GT Racing is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (4,800 mAh vs 4,000 mAh). BeastScore: Honor X40 GT Racing 83.6/100, Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 84.0/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Honor X40 GT Racing and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

Honor X40 GT Racing has a 6.81-inch display and 4800 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 4000 mAh battery.

How do Honor X40 GT Racing and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra compare for speed?

Honor X40 GT Racing scores 86/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 50 Ultra scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship SoC Architecture
22 min read

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive 3nm Mobile Silicon Architecture, GPU Ray Tracing & Gaming Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3nm architectural deep dive comparing Qualcomm custom Oryon CPU, MediaTek All-Big-Core Dimensity 9400, and Apple A18 Pro—covering microarchitecture, Adreno 830 vs Immortalis-G925 ray tracing, NPU compute, thermal throttling, and real-world gaming frame rates.

Read →
MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro vs. Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive TSMC 2nm Architecture, Dual 4.55GHz C2-Ultra Cores, Mali-G2 Ultra NX Ray Tracing, NPU 1090 Hardware KV-Cache, LPDDR6, and Mobile Silicon Showdown (2026)2nm Flagship Breakthrough
14 min read

MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro vs. Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Apple A18 Pro: The Definitive TSMC 2nm Architecture, Dual 4.55GHz C2-Ultra Cores, Mali-G2 Ultra NX Ray Tracing, NPU 1090 Hardware KV-Cache, LPDDR6, and Mobile Silicon Showdown (2026)

MediaTek unveils the world's first TSMC 2nm flagship mobile chipset with a radical 2+3+3 All-Big-Core CPU layout, Arm Mali-G2 Ultra NX neural graphics, LPDDR6 memory subsystem, and NPU 1090 with hardware KV cache compression. Here is our exhaustive architectural breakdown, power efficiency curves, ray tracing benchmarks, and engineering comparison against Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and Apple A18 Pro.

Read →