Honor Magic7 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+: Which One Should You Buy?

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ edges ahead with a BeastScore of 87.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Honor · 2025

Honor Magic7 Lite

Honor Magic7 Lite
87/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
87/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ wins 1 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Honor Magic7 Lite
Honor Magic7 Lite
0 wins
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Honor Magic7 LiteSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    86
    86
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    95
    95
  • DisplaySamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
    89
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ has the bigger battery10,090 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ has the bigger screen12.4" vs 6.78"
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ has the faster chipExynos 1380 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Honor Magic7 Lite
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
  • ✓Bigger 10,090 mAh battery (+3,490 mAh)
  • ✓12.4" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationHonor Magic7 LiteSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
1. Display & Screen🏆 Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.78"12.4"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (437 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 6 Gen 1 Exynos 1380
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight189 gN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68Not listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity6,600 mAh10,090 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
Bluetoothv5.1Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0Not listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ wins — BeastScore 87.4/100

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (10,090 mAh vs 6,600 mAh) and bigger screen (12.4" vs 6.78").

Buy Honor Magic7 Lite if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Buy Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ if you want

Larger battery: 10,090 mAh vs 6,600 mAh · Larger display: 12.4" vs 6.78"

Common questions

Which is better: Honor Magic7 Lite or Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+?

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (10,090 mAh vs 6,600 mAh) and bigger screen (12.4" vs 6.78"). BeastScore: Honor Magic7 Lite 86.6/100, Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 87.4/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Honor Magic7 Lite and Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+?

Honor Magic7 Lite has a 6.78-inch display and 6600 mAh battery. Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ has a 12.4-inch display and 10090 mAh battery.

How do Honor Magic7 Lite and Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ compare for speed?

Honor Magic7 Lite scores 86/100 for performance; Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ scores 86/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →