Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB
Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1)
WHY IS Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1) BETTER THAN Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Huawei Mediapad | Apple iPhone | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 1,500 mAh | 3,274 mAh | +3,274 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7.01" | 6.12" | 7.01" |
| Chassis Weight | 249g | 187g | 187g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 65.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1)
Which is better: Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB or Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1)?
Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1) leads with an overall BeastScore of 65.8/100 compared to Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 65.8 vs top rival 60.8 and Larger battery capacity: 3,274 mAh (+1,774 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB and Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1)?
Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB is equipped with a 7.01-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1) features a 6.12-inch display and 3274 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB and Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1) scores 80/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
A17k
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB vs Galaxy Folder2
Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Huawei Mediapad X2 GEM-702L Dual SIM TD-LTE 32GB vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro 5G A3101 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP CA MX SA 256GB (Apple iPhone 16,1) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.