Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
Iconia Tab 7 A1-713
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
WHY IS Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 BETTER THAN Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Iconia Tab | Xiaomi Mi4 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 3,400 mAh | 3,080 mAh | +3,400 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 2 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7" | 5" | 7" |
| Chassis Weight | 298g | 149g | 149g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Which is better: Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 or Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Larger battery capacity: 3,400 mAh (+320 mAh more) and Significantly larger display: 7" vs max 5" for media & multitasking.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3400 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) features a 5-inch display and 3080 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Galaxy Folder2
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Hongmi / Redmi 2013022 (Xiaomi Red Rice)
BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 vs Galaxy Folder2
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Galaxy Folder2
Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Iconia Tab 7 A1-713 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Hardware Deep DiveDJI Osmo Action 5 Pro vs. GoPro HERO 13 Black vs. Insta360 Ace Pro 2 vs. DJI Osmo Pocket 3: The Definitive Flagship Action & Vlogging Camera Architecture, Next-Gen 1/1.3" HDR Sensors, 4nm AI ISP Silicon, 8K30 / 4K120 10-Bit D-Log M, Low-Light Performance, Magnetic Mount Ecosystems, and Real-World Thermal Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
A 4-way architectural shootout testing next-gen 1/1.3-inch HDR sensors, 4nm AI silicon, HB-series optical lens mods, 13.5-stop dynamic range, 8K30 capture, 4-hour battery runtimes, and 1.0-inch gimbal vlogging fidelity.