iPad 9.7 (2018) vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS iPad 9.7 (2018) BETTER THAN Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | iPad 9.7 | Xiaomi Mi4 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 1,500 mAh | 3,080 mAh | +3,080 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 8 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 9.7" | 5" | 9.7" |
| Chassis Weight | 469g | 149g | 149g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄iPad 9.7 (2018) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, iPad 9.7 (2018) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: iPad 9.7 (2018) vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Which is better: iPad 9.7 (2018) or Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
iPad 9.7 (2018) leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Significantly larger display: 9.7" vs max 5" for media & multitasking.
What are the primary battery and display differences between iPad 9.7 (2018) and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
iPad 9.7 (2018) is equipped with a 9.7-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) features a 5-inch display and 3080 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between iPad 9.7 (2018) and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, iPad 9.7 (2018) achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Hongmi / Redmi 2013022 (Xiaomi Red Rice)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
iPad 9.7 (2018) vs Galaxy Folder2
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Galaxy Folder2
iPad 9.7 (2018) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
iPad 9.7 (2018) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
iPad 9.7 (2018) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
MarketTrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026
TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.
GuideHere are the Apple iPhone Duo alternatives
Explore top alternatives to the $2,000 Apple iPhone Duo, including the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, Xiaomi 18 Fold 5G, Vivo X Fold5 Pro, and OnePlus Open 2.
