BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Lab Benchmark Battle

iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Apple · 2017

iPad Pro 10.5 (2017)

iPad Pro 10.5 (2017)
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Oppo · 2024

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) BETTER THAN Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

iPad Pro 10.5 (2017)Winner 🏆
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORiPad ProOppo Reno11LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity8,134 mAh5,000 mAh+8,134 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor12 MPN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size10.5"6.7"10.5"
Chassis Weight469g177g177g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy iPad Pro 10.5 (2017):
  • ✓Larger 8,134 mAh battery capacity (+3,134 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓12MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓10.5" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603):
  • ✓292g lighter chassis (177g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓6.7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationiPad Pro 10.5 (2017)Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
1. Display & Screen🏆 iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) Wins Display
Screen Type & TechIPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsAM-OLED display
Screen Size10.5"6.7"
Resolution & Density1668x2224 (265 ppi)1080x2412 (394 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemiOS Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory4 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage4GB / 512GB256GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) Wins Camera
Primary Camera12 MPN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens7 MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight469 g177 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity8,134 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspotWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, EDRBluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & Speed3.0, proprietary reversible connector; magnetic connectorUSB Type-C
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose iPad Pro 10.5 (2017):
Larger battery capacity: 8,134 mAh (+3,134 mAh more) · Higher resolution main sensor: 12 MP vs max 0 MP
When to choose Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603):
More system memory: 8GB RAM vs max 4GB · Lighter body: 177g (292g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Which is better: iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) or Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)?

iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) (71.4/100), driven by advantages in Larger battery capacity: 8,134 mAh (+3,134 mAh more) and Higher resolution main sensor: 12 MP vs max 0 MP.

What are the primary battery and display differences between iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) and Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)?

iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) is equipped with a 10.5-inch display and 8134 mAh battery, while Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) features a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) and Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) achieves a 64/100 performance score, while Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) scores 80/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Samsung

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)

Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Google

Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Oppo

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real WinnerDeep Dive
9 min read

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner

We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.

Read Analysis →
TrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026Market
4 min read

TrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026

TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.

Read Analysis →
Here are the Apple iPhone Duo alternativesGuide
6 min read

Here are the Apple iPhone Duo alternatives

Explore top alternatives to the $2,000 Apple iPhone Duo, including the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, Xiaomi 18 Fold 5G, Vivo X Fold5 Pro, and OnePlus Open 2.

Read Analysis →